Search:

Type: Posts; User: Damaratus; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 42 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.04 seconds.

  1. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    I did warn you all. You really should not be arguing these things on this thread. Thread locked. Any serious questions about how the AUP will apply to such images can be sent to me via PMs. Some...
  2. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    KidLoose: I would say you're perfectly fine. It's not on our site, it's not something we have to worry about. The only reason we would have pause for something like that is if the link went to...
  3. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    I'm going to summarize again because you all are not comprehending what I said before.

    This thread is not here for you to argue yourselves to death about the current court case in Iowa or whether...
  4. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Sheer: Your images are fine as they stand. The rules are to manage the purely obvious cases, devils have no particular age to assign to them, therefore they wouldn't fall under the "minor" category...
  5. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    FriskyWoods: I feel the same way, part of the reason that a lawyer is being contacted. If you feel so strongly, you should try and find a way to affect the laws that bind the US, not get angry here....
  6. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Domo: There were further evolutions in that case that you have posted about. The link is from news in 2008. Recently that guy plead guilty to a couple of the charges that were left in the question...
  7. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    FriskyWoods: It's not the site's problem discerning reality and fiction. It's current US law and a very vague set of rules regarding obscenities.
  8. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    AlexInsane: You're not adding anything positive to this thread. You can stop commenting now, or have a time out from the forums if you continue.

    Luc Folf: See my answer to Jadlardia above. Teen...
  9. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Fiz: You can go to art museums around the world and see child nudity, there's no reason for us to remove something that has no sexual undertones to it.

    TehSean: We really don't want to have to...
  10. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Jadlardia: In its most simplest form. If we see someone saying in a description or otherwise that "this kid is underage" then we're going to know he's a minor and will take action accordingly if the...
  11. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Jadlardia and TehSean: The problem isn't merely in the creation of the rules, it's the fact that even US law has areas that are so vague and nebulous that it puts a strange burden on the site to try...
  12. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Juliamon: To answer your question. The primary issue is underage human/proto-human characters in mature situations. A transformation of a character as you have created should not fall under this...
  13. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Hey folks, this is a fair warning. This thread was designed for questions about the rule. It is not about whether cub should be lumped in with the rest shota/loli. If the thread continues in this...
  14. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    Not easily, that's what lawyers do, which is why we're trying to speak with one. We just know about recent court cases (one particularly in Iowa) and what other countries have cracked down on. We...
  15. Replies
    494
    Views
    45,355

    Re: Loli/Shota (2010)

    The idea is that there is clear law and court cases regarding human shota/loli stuff. We are not trying to just blank it all (even if you want that to happen) we keep trying to stay within the realm...
  16. Replies
    1
    Views
    462

    Re: Why is this on FA?

    This was a troll, comment was removed.
  17. Replies
    692
    Views
    35,156

    Re: So what's all this hubbub about FurNation?

    Paypal has issue with anything involving adult content. Any website that happens to host adult material and tries to use Paypal will inevitably be in danger of losing use of Paypal.




    It...
  18. Replies
    193
    Views
    3,992

    Poll: Re: Animal testing, yes or no?

    There are already a very large number of control factors that are imposed upon any laboratory that wishes to perform animal testing (note: I'm speaking for U.S. laboratories, not for those abroad)....
  19. Replies
    1
    Views
    1,720

    Re: Site Offline 4/19/09

    Site is back up.
  20. Replies
    1
    Views
    1,720

    Site Offline 4/19/09

    The main site has been taken offline to determine the cause of the site slowdown and the 502 errors.
  21. Replies
    253
    Views
    5,508

    Re: Why do people seriously believe in evolution?

    Had I caught this well before 11 pages I would have locked it anyway, this thread is done. I would suggest keeping away from any debate regarding evolution, because the people against it are often...
  22. Replies
    4
    Views
    18,041

    Site Taken Offline 2-25-2009 11:48pm ET

    FurAffinity is preventively offline while we investigate a security vulnerability, but that we do not currently believe that the vulnerability was on the FurAffinity side. However, to contain...
  23. Replies
    40
    Views
    2,036

    Re: Comments...such hostility

    Unfortunately this thread leaves out a lot of the finer details about what had happened with this particular person. It's also kind of hypocritical because the one being "flamed" decided to flame...
  24. Replies
    117
    Views
    3,375

    Re: Complete Blocking Sytem

    I'm sorry, but complete blocking wouldn't get around the issue of someone creating new accounts. It just isn't going to happen this way.
  25. Replies
    117
    Views
    3,375

    Re: Complete Blocking Sytem

    At this point in time I do not see this kind of thing being put in place. FA is still meant to be a community gallery and not fall into certain levels of exclusivity. While the OP's intent of...
Results 1 to 25 of 1034
Page 1 of 42 1 2 3 4
Links monetized by VigLink