Search:

Was a bit slow a moment ago but is loading fine now. :V It was barely down for 10 minutes.

To the people that say delete the shout, generally it's a bad idea to do that (if you want it as evidence) as that deletes the proof. Now. Hiding comments on submissions is fine as that can be...

It is, but let's wait til they say something...and naa not your browser choice, doing the same with chrome and firefox here.

I sincerely doubt that. It's happening around peek hours. Though from my understanding of the specs of the servers that shouldn't be happening...if it's just users and not a DDoS

I don't want to speak for FA on this but if I recall correctly there was something about the worry of a new coder leaking security flaws in the system. Please correct me if I am wrong...

Seems the...

Yeah, just now for me everything is slow. Not just one specific area like it was before.

I notice this issue tends to be most active when removing journals. Anywhere from 5-30 seconds to remove a journal.

Actually, if you consider bots using shouts then just blocking shouts with offsite links it might be good for there. All though for journals and such it could be allowed.

Could just do a whitelist...

Back up now...people should really learn to wait at least 30 minutes.

I can understand an increased ban time for someone that told others how to reproduce the problem, but permanent? Ehh...not really fair. Maybe I am too lax honestly.

The only thing I can say is,...

I too have to side with what Arshes said. Banners are okay, but full background graphics like that would just detriment from some pieces value very easily.

I think it would be a useful feature. It could possibly be rigged to just fill out a trouble ticket if they didn't want to make a new system for it.
The added text should also be included as it...

I do believe you are the first person to actually say something about it. I also assume by chance no administrators are on during this time to notice it.

I don't think it's random either, it's...

Appears to be working now appropriately, in terms of browsing via browse.

Searching via search does not work

Hmm, nothing was stated on the sheep addition so I shall try again. D;
Unless of course it is already there.

Appears search might need an update. It shows old listings. eg; searching adjot shows old items but not all the newer ones.

It shows 2010 items but none of the 2011 items like it used too.

Pretty nice, although noticed a complaint or two about no "Sheep" species.

Ali - Can you not read the "FA Staffers are not Furocity staffers" eg; there is nothing FA can do aside from contact Gavin and let him know whats going on. They do not have access to Furocity's...

Mmm, ohhh mainpage/browsing ones are blocked, but gallery ones are not. As gallery thumbnails have an image thumbnail address like this http://t.facdn.net/6702911@75-1319068567.jpg

Adblocking their art folder works, but does not prevent gallery/mainpage thumbnails. So if you happen to click on it it'll just block it when you go to the image.

It was the system added to prevent hyperlinks to favorite / watch a random user.

I just realized, the "Manage Watch" in Control Panel doesn't include the new key system!

I just realized I am guilty of one of mine unchecked. I should go tidy up.

Don't forget the people that move accounts and leave themselves watching thousands of people. *cough* UnshackledFenrir *cough*
A delete account feature would be nice.

...And don't banned accounts /store/ those?

This was in response to the massive amount of journals/submissions/comments message inbox.

I would assume they do, since my friend is banned, and she...