
Originally Posted by
fwbrown61
Remarkable.
(Newbie is glued to screen, skimming posts)
Really, remarkable. As a snapshot into fur/FA politics,
this thread *is* something to watch.
(Newbie smacks self in head, struggles to turn off
computer, else no other work gets done today)
An observation: in politics, semantics is everything.
To the people involved here, and after a years work, it
feels like a merger.
Natural, then, to call it that.
Except that in a political sense, it's more properly
an *alliance.*
(Newbie grabs for old political science textbook to
dig out definition... then smacks muzzle with it.
Work, work to do...)
Alliance. ALLIANCE. Alli-an-ce. Or if you're dsylexic, Encailla
Say, that word sorta sounds good, doesn't it?
Merger carries the connotations of change or loss
of identity for one or both sides.
Alliance implies stability of identity, if not enhancement
of it. At the least, more of a win-win situation in terms
of shared goals.
(Newbie just had to read the pages that fell open, damn it)
From reading between lines here, strikes me that
what's going to be happening looks more like an alliance
than a merger.
This opinion will, I'm sure, have a profound effect on the
further course of this thread. And the temperature of the
firestorm. :- /
(Work, work, work, screams the Newbie, about to
dump his coffee on the keyboard as a last resort.)
And I remain,
Flashing on: 'Sir, sir, Rebel Alliance sortie in sector 12!! Scan is giving targetting images... Wait: tails?' :- )
Fred Brown.