Well I think this little exchange had a pretty good ending. B+
Anyways. Furry hate? Furries draw pictures of animals having sex, and then make threads about why people hate them. I was not aware this sort of thing required explanation.
When you are on the 6th or higher page of notes, the link for the earliest listed page is broken.
In the screen shot, I am on page 6, and in the url bar shown is what the "2" links to.
Hard to test/duplicate if you don't have 6 pages of notes, however.
Most of that review focused on the old cannon, which the author abandoned because he knew it was bad and made no sense. So, fantastic and wonderful job in pointing out the obvious and self-confessed flaws of a younger artist/writer. Do you next want to dig through his mom's closet so you can...
No you didn't. Not in this thread, anyways. All you did was call it unfunny and then proceeded to insult anyone who enjoys it. Not really what I'd call a "review".
I see most people liked the mini-ads more.
Despite this! I bought adspace in both places, and notice that I got more people clicking on the banner ad!
Interesting how that works out.
Re: Comics that contain fetish yet at the same time have characterization and good pl
Whatever the hell "LOLFURRY" means.
Dog Days of Summer is pretty standard. Very well drawn, lots of nudity but no sex (Blotch is such a tease!)
Try again. Harder.
I don't know, all the instructions - which fields to fill out, which ones not to fill out - are pretty clear. Try a different e-mail?
I've seen that Bondage is pretty much a default fetish for the vastly majority of... well, everybody, not just furries. People who don't have any other fetishes probably are into it, and it's probably the second favorite for a lot of people who's top favorite has been excluded.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.