Search results

He could've chosen his words MUCH better. If I was running a site and something I had linked to it got shut down, I'd investigate the issue myself rather than saying "oh, soandso told me this person did it, so I'm blaming them before talking to them about it!" The point is he was quick to...

Hey, on the bright side, FA's forums are running faster now. :D

The funny thing is, I don't think his opinion would change anyways, considering quite a few went to his announcement to defend FA and ask for physical evidence that Dragoneer was directly responsible. When he couldn't provide said proof but only "his word", he had no grounds to fight on, and...

Methinks it could just be a fluke, and he'll try bringing the site back up a few hours, days, or weeks later to see if the FA defenders will go away.

Pulled from my Twitter:

Well, that sux. Pun wholly intended.

They're working on getting FA completely online.

Whoever Zachski is earned himself bonus points for calling out the site admin on breaking his own rules. Even though he probably doesn't care, if the admin doesn't follow the rules they set out (even though the main admin can do anything they want), it makes them look bad.

Well, he still seems bent on believing FA had a part in his PayPal being closed, even though he openly admits he knew the risks. Still no visual proof, though.

Heh, I'm not sure how registration was before, but if it was changed, they made it so all accounts made have to be approved by an administrator now. Was going to post the ED link in the thread with the following text, "Congratulations! How do you feel?" However, the registration being like...

Simple: It's the "We got caught red-handed doing something we weren't supposed to be doing, so we're going to point the finger at something more popular than us to put all of the blame on them!" defense.

Well, lo and behold, the thread is back with supposed "proof" that Dragoneer was involved. http://furnation.com/index.php?showtopic=78088&pid=219247&st=0&#entry219247 I still don't think that's "proof" that Dragoneer did anything about it. For all he knows, it could've been some random person...

Known: nek0gami Tincrash Suspected: Hobbes_Maxwell

I looked in another thread and saw someone mention Hobbes_Maxwell...

So, if the pictures prove true, then Nek0gami and Tincrash were hit. Who was the third?

I had this about 2 months ago, and with my 2 hour battle with it, this is what it did to me: Anytime I would try to do Start -> Run -> msconfig or open Windows Explorer, the "worm" would force my computer to restart. Anytime I would try to open a Firefox or Internet Explorer browser, the "worm"...

The only reason I'm "continuing" is because all of the posted strategies in this thread, I've proven to not work with this guy. I've sent a reminder note to Dragoneer a few hours ago, then noticed that the one I sent him 2 days ago hasn't even been touched, but know that Dragoneer has been on...

Exactly. Finally someone who gets the light of the situation.

My description is not referring to him. That was done many months ago before I had a run-in with this person. Show to me where I say we're popular. You don't need to be popular to be stalked. And no, you don't know the entire details of the situation. If you knew every detail over the...

I suggest staff close this thread. My mate's too agitated with the community now to even bother. These people think being stalked in real life with the internet as one tool being used is something to make fun of. Those people are the kind of people who have never been stalked in their life...