My point is here, just because she happens to have a sona as an animal does not automatically mean she is a "furry fan", for all we know she may of just wanted something different to a persona.
The problem is we are only getting information from one side of it, we have not got her side of it...
You need to realize that just because somebody "Just so happens" to have a sona that "just so happens" to be an anthro it DOES NOT mean they are a furry. That is like saying trolls must be furries because they post on a furry forum.
You need to also realize that people have a CHOICE whether to...
What business would it be of some alien to make such a decision in the first place?
EDIT: I would also like to add that what does ones personal shitty life have to do with killing or not killing off a race?
So? if she doesn't want to be called a furry then respect that. By your definition every cartoonist ever to draw an anthro is a furry. No, in my eyes you are only furry if you want to be called a furry.
EDIT: This is what pisses a lot of people off, when furries go around labeling everything...
Go read through the thread again, I am not THE only one who "raged" about it. And the fact you bitched at me about bitching about a word tells me you do care what people think, if you didn't care you would of said nothing.
Also who said I was trying to "defend" something here? I merely stated...
I have been watching this thread for awhile now and it appears most furries (or at least a alrge number of us) are just hobbiests with a small number being lifestylers.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.