Search results

Correct, most religions do. This is as I said in a previous post having to do with people trying to explain concepts with a limited experience. What people understood back then is different than what we know now, and especially since people understand things. However, even now that...

Of course God has a sense of humor, that's why the platypus exists! ;)

Again with the concept of how *we* think in terms of science as *we* know it. So this goes again in circles. Computers were created by man. So again this invalidates the argument since there is a possibility of "thinking" that isn't the way we know it. So what happened before the Big Bang...

Which goes back to what the user said, the thought process God uses may not use the same process of "thinking" as a regular human. Hence again, goes back to my point that thinking is actually a broad term in the sense we're applying terms we know as a human and how other humans think. So...

Now that we have links to a comment for anchoring. Ie. http://www.furaffinity.net/view/490946/#cid:2655172 anchors directly to a comment I made. Can we please receive the same type of message in the message center? It makes it easier to find a comment, especially with pages of scroll D:

Logical Fault, "thinking" is a broad term. Conscious is not relating to this term properly. The conclusion at the end, derails.

Roary correct. I think there are those too tied into the rituals of religion to understand that science is just explaining things. There will be conflicts because of beliefs and faith. To me, the Bible, and other religious scriptures were metaphors and ways of explaining great things in a...

/me necros the thread. I just wanted to remind fans this coming Monday, April 23 will start up the final episodes!

What state is Myne? I never remember this state in my studies o.O;;;

You can view your own mature artwork at home. There is no reason to put it up on a site that says you're violating their Terms of Service if you do. So I really don't understand the argument here.

Incorrect. I said you applied it incorrectly and stated why. This was a constant source of strife among people who feel the need to be condescending to others and tear them down. Had you read about it, it was stating how it should be applied and very well stated it couldn't prove the non...

Bellbottom (jeans) clips. Yes, they invented something to keep your bellbottoms (jeans) from getting caught in the spokes of your bike.

LOL more like ...LONG winded, or tl;dr in the sense that I had one sentence that said: While Occam's razor cannot prove God's nonexistence, it does imply that, in the absence of compelling reasons to believe in God, disbelief should be preferred.

Erm yeah Mocaw, that's exactly why I posted earlier her application of Occam's Razor was a complete failure and stated why XD

Bolding for corrections... I won't get into the other mistakes because it's being too particular but the errors in the sentence made me think of the kind of setup for a bad joke. ..Guy walks into a bar... That said, why would that change a person's belief?

Well, what if God's "Ultimate Plan" was really, "I'm letting you do whatever the hell (lol) you want and I'm gonna watch". I don't think that would nullify it at all.

NBC has had a really big ratings slump. I think the problem isn't so much about the sensationalism (meaning I don't mind the footage of the violence), but the new age of reporters that don't even ask questions. Walking up to a frightened student "Do you feel scared, you were frightened...

Again, since I'm becoming a broken record. You're referring to a Straw Man argument. This is what I've repeatedly said through threads, that she's not addressing the point she's arguing around it, and manipulating the subject to make herself feel she's the clear winner in the debate. In...

Uhh, that's why a lot of people get trained with guns because the idea is to protect themselves. It's not just hey I got more shiny Metal Bling Wang! There ARE people like that, but that's not why people have guns.

Sure, if you like Straw Man arguments. So no, manipulating arguments can cause a lot of vindictive behavior. It's called in short "putting words in someone's mouth" That's not a way to behave.