Search results

Which only goes to show their system is arbitrary.

You probably should have picked three.

The Ipad.

I was quoting a commercial.

He's made a habit of putting apps on the forums without testing them first, just like the "this" count which took less than a hour to hit the fan.

"There's a app for that"

This isn't the first time he's done something like this you do realize? And no I wasn't saying de-admin him, I was saying revoke his ability to ban and infract for a set period of time. There should be some sort of repercussion for what happened.

I was referring to if there's a new rule you can't infract someone for doing that before the rule was made. Let's say there's a new rule saying users can't have the word "ass" in their username, now if the rules weren't retroactive you wouldn't be able to infract someone with the username...

fix'd

4 all expired a long time ago.

Explain how come accountability got so many infractions then? No what I'm getting at is that questioning how the site is run is more likely to get you infracted. Regardless the rule was made to retroactively ban someone. Ratte overturned the ban, carenth banned him without discussion. I know...

What about atleast having rules not being retroactive?

Jashwa I've come to expect you never agreeing with me. If you expect me to agree with you just cause you have the most post counts you are wrong. He admitted he installed the applet, how is that speculation? The forum rules were changed just to ban someone. I will admit what happened didn't...

The forum rules were retroactively changed in order to ban someone, that isn't just a abuse of power, that is tearing up the forum rules and then taking a piss on them. If you ask me they need to add in that rules can not under any circumstance be retroactive.

Okay. Here's my problem, the forum rules are not a guideline, it is doctrine and nobody not even dragoneer himself should be above it.

I won't argue with you there if someone has been banned for clearcut rulebreaking, then yes it was justified. There needs to be a complete overhaul on how the staff conducts themselves, so that no one regardless of who they are are above the rules.

On the flip side of that we could have people doing whatever they want without any sort of accountability. Seriously for fucking sakes staff atleast take about carenth's ability to ban/infract for a period of time. He's outright proven he can't handle having that power without horribly...

Then how do you explain the fiasco yesterday? Accountability was banned for bringing up issues with the site, if someone is going to get banned for that atleast put it in the forum rules. I'd be better than having people pull dick moves and ragepermabanning people to shut them up.

There should be one for permabans.

Anything that isn't totally arbitrary is welcomed. Right now the ability to ban people without any sort of guesstimate of a number poorly defines mods/admins powers, right now it's so poorly defined that someone could go, "Oh 1 infraction... Hmm I don't like this guy... BAN!" tl;dr anything that...