Search results

You will get the same response here. What you're doing is illegal.

We're taling furry as in the fandom, not the adjective, Roose...

I wouldn't flag it.

More like Lion King was never intended to be for furries. So if I worked at Disney, I'd be all "Hell no, furfags. You ain't claiming that shit."

I'm suddenly cool now :3

No, I do not. Notice how this one isn't "lulz in hell trollfags", it's trying to make a point. Edit: Not to say his opinion is wrong or right, but it's more meant to invoke debate rather then pointless baiting.

Especially now that I smoke weed~ I mean

What I find most difficult is learning how to deal with insults because they always happen. You have to learn to play along sometimes.

One is inflammatory. I could keep saying this, but one is meant to cause butthurt. If you can't tell the difference, I can't help you.

One is meant to be inflammatory.

Depends on what they said. If it's just "lol Twilight sucks" then yes.

But you could do the same thing by bullying people in real life! Oh wait, that might be dangerous. :[

Harassment/trolling.

I was supposed to get my character Loki drawn with your magician-girl. That's all, I think. x3

I flag + ignore.

I like how you think your definition is the only right one. Even though you haven't explained it.

It's not a furry movie. Get over it. It was not made by or for the fandom.

Do you have to post a thread when that happens? Really?

Hopefully this means no more bitching from the OP.

As soon as a gay guy steps in the room everyone should hide their ass, this is a fact