Doberman_Moralist
New Member
Let's talk about facts:
Reminders give advertise only 3 ychs per day. The main activity is when someone comes only at night. For a night you can lay out only 3 pieces in 8 hours. When you have more than 10 ychs, you cannot sell them. The way out of the situation is more reminders at night or an increase in the allowed number of reminders. So you can see not 10 seconds, but 2 times more. The point is in number of published, and not only in the gap between these..
A big minus of the new rule is the inability of the administration to remove violators. All my complaints were ignored by the administration. Only a few received an answer in which there was an answer that they could not do anything. Violators receive great privileges, because they lose their competition and can be in sight of all the time.
And it's hard for me to blame them, because there is no alternative for development. Rules limit the market without giving anything new. Therefore, I consider these rules to be a mistake.
Perhaps they would be effective in combination with something that would give alternatives without losing and would not allow violators to get all the attention and take away this opportunity from other artists.
Reminders give advertise only 3 ychs per day. The main activity is when someone comes only at night. For a night you can lay out only 3 pieces in 8 hours. When you have more than 10 ychs, you cannot sell them. The way out of the situation is more reminders at night or an increase in the allowed number of reminders. So you can see not 10 seconds, but 2 times more. The point is in number of published, and not only in the gap between these..
A big minus of the new rule is the inability of the administration to remove violators. All my complaints were ignored by the administration. Only a few received an answer in which there was an answer that they could not do anything. Violators receive great privileges, because they lose their competition and can be in sight of all the time.
And it's hard for me to blame them, because there is no alternative for development. Rules limit the market without giving anything new. Therefore, I consider these rules to be a mistake.
Perhaps they would be effective in combination with something that would give alternatives without losing and would not allow violators to get all the attention and take away this opportunity from other artists.