Some people have rules on how their characters are protrayed or reproduced. I actually specify people can't reproduce my character without my permission so this can get pretty legally bad fast.I think the fair use rule is at play here, Since the guy doing this project is using 50,000 images from e621.
50,000 e621 images? Including tags like "what has science done" , "what", or the infamous cheese-grater image? That AI probably has PTSD. I'm shocked those fursonas came out half as decent.
I see, so these are likely cherry-picked good results from a large batch of hits or misses? I also spotted an off-brand Leafeon, and a few goat moms.There's some bad ones. In all honesty, they probably created 50,000 just to get 100 good ones. Interestingly, you can dollar store Judy Hops, Krystal, Fem-Nick Wylde, and a few other commonly drawn characters as creations.
Meh, I doubt it. Ever played a city-building or management game? The AI can't even figure out how a one way street works in those things.
By Talos, what is going ON with the ears on the sonas to the right and left of that? What is that large protrusion from her head on the left one? It looks like someone is draining her color like life-force. And why does cat Judy Hopps have one ear and a small blunted goat horn? These are clearly rhetorical questions... but I wish I could ask the AI what it's thought process was! >_<
One of the first that appeared to me