• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

any views on diaperfurs?

Status
Not open for further replies.

lil_squirrel

New Member
So lately i've been asked to draw a lot more diaperfur art, sometimes sexual sometimes not...honestly i have no problem with watersports, but im not a fan of scat at all (although, as an art whore i cant really object to much)...my view is: these furs are cute if portrayed correctly, whether adult age or cubbish/a needed item or just a sissy. but i've noticed not a lot of ppl like them. i can understand not liking the ppl who wear them in public and shove it in ppls faces(figuratively)...but wouldnt anything get annoying if someone only wanted attention for it? i suppose moderation and a little common decency would go a long way here. and i posted this to get a little feedback on the topic. if any diaperfurs like to chat send me a message too ^-^ im always looking for new friends no matter what ur views are...

...and while i am open to all views, remember: if u cant say anything nice or constructive, dont say anything at all...
 

Trance

Likes blueberries?
My view on them: FAIL

fuck nice or constructive...
 
Last edited:

Alstor

And twice as shiny
...and while i am open to all views, remember: if u cant say anything nice or constructive, dont say anything at all...
This won't happen. I'm telling you that right now.

On the original topic, I do not like most cub furs for the fact that they promote other disgusting fetishes, they usually whine when confronted about anti-cub debates, and, more importantly, IT'S KIDS HAVING SEX IN THOSE PICTURES!

That said, a very small amount of the NON-SEXUAL art is nice, but that's only for cuteness reasons.
 
S

Syradact

Guest
...and while i am open to all views, remember: if u cant say anything nice or constructive, dont say anything at all...
This won't fly here. FAF is not your hugbox.

That said, I don't like diaperfurs.
 

Willow

FAF's #1 Terrorist
Will you draw my fursona as a baby :V

I have no problem with cub/diaper furs as long as it's clean, same thing with loli/shota

Oh yea, and FA's not a hugbox and stuff
 
D

Don

Guest
I can already here the pitchfork and torch mobs coming...

...and I'm going to cheer them on when they arrive. I find cub porn to be absolutely disgusting, not only because it shows some truly foul fetishes but because it is basically pedophilia.
 

Oovie

Fabulous Secret Powers
I could care less how innocent you appear to mask it, I'll still dislike it all regardless. Then whilst it being innocent, I don't get what the attraction to it is either. So we do art of baby animals sucking bottles and playing with building blocks? What the heck is this shit!
 

ArielMT

'Net Help Desk
There are a few differences between the groups lumped into one here.

Babyfur porn: Usually lumped in with cub porn, and in my book rightly so. Absolutely repulses me. This topic has been done to death already, and it'll be done to death a lot more before any consensus is reached.

Babyfur art: Some of it's cute, but not all. I'm not even sure if it's most.

Diaperfur porn: Adults having sex in diapers. I struggle to understand how it's possible, and I always wind up dismissing it as fantastic as TV starships making sounds in space.

Diaperfur art: Not all of it is bad, but of all the art out there showing spent diapers, I can count the ones I like on just one hand. Even then, only because it's subtle or funny.

But as the other posts warned, there's an awful lot of opposition to anything diaper-related here, and it's extremely vocal opposition. If diapers are up your alley at all, keep it here on the forums like you would a real diaper out in public:

Completely out of sight.

OP's post count: 1

Nothing else need be said here.

Following his pawprint, though:
Registered since: August 22nd, 2007 04:44
 
As long as people aren't fucking babies or animals I'm indifferent to strange and outlandish fetishes.

I could care less how innocent you appear to mask it, I'll still dislike it all regardless. Then whilst it being innocent, I don't get what the attraction to it is either. So we do art of baby animals sucking bottles and playing with building blocks? What the heck is this shit!

Fixed. Given the topic, I believe you put emphasis on the wrong word. ;)
 

Silver Dragon

Don't worry, I'm a doctor.
Following his pawprint, though:

In that case, he's had PLENTY of time/chances to lurk, and should have known this

But as the other posts warned, there's an awful lot of opposition to anything diaper-related here, and it's extremely vocal opposition.

already.
 

ArielMT

'Net Help Desk
Indeed.
 

MrBlack

Is an alligator
Diaperfurs are just pedophiles who suck at getting children in their van so they masturbate to animal children :U


Oh, and this thread is bad and you should feel bad :U
 

Ricky

Well-Known Member
My old friend Blaine was at Furloween and some random babyfur he never met before started tugging at his shirt and said "hey, I just went poopies. Will you change me?" And Blaine said "what- the- fuck.. NO, get the hell away from me."

That's my story.
 

Glitch

SLUDGE FACE
The only views I think diaperfurs/pedophiles should have are the ones facing incinerators.

/pissed off from outside sources
 

Kobu

Member
I'm not a huge fan. Seems really, really, really, really weird to me.

Coming from a furry, that should go a long way. ^_^
 

Ames

it smells like dust and moon light
Heh. My view?


striker.jpg
 

Thallis

God Thinks You're an Idiot
For everyone's information: Diaperfur art is not the same as babyfur art which is not the same as cub porn. I'm not sure if some of you are being sarcastic or are just retarded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top