Schwimmwagen
Well-Known Member
The Cod 4 screen has ever-so-slightly blurry textures and much less bloom. Not much difference, I say.
BLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!The Cod 4 screen has ever-so-slightly blurry textures and much less bloom. Not much difference, I say.
Well firstly, that is the most boring part of Metro. I'd find the screenshots I took of the underground elements, but they've disappeared. But I do promise you, BF3 has way more in the Graphics department than MW3. And the huge-scaled maps... Hot damn!Did you guys really just compare CoD 4 with BF3? Of course the newer game's gonna have better graphics, they're 4 years apart ffs. This should do more justice.
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/188/bf32011093020065365.png
http://www.callofduty.com/mw3/img/images/mw3-image-2011-015.jpg
BF3 seems too bright imo, and MW3 looks more detailed. Not to say BF3 won't be a great game but I think MW3 has it beat graphics wise and based on the type of gameplay I prefer CoD more. I'll end it at that.
/derail
BF3 has alot more innovation.
I've managed to get around this. Log onto the battlelog direct from your browser, and go from there.Error code 1 trying to launch the game... Nice move by Origin.
I fell in love with this game after I've seen alpha and the gameplay trailers, but now?
That's the only thing I did... This game doesn't really support left hand players as well, since so many buttons are set to be chat buttons and can't be reconfigured.I've managed to get around this. Log onto the battlelog direct from your browser, and go from there.
Well if you really are in Israel, I doubt you'd be having problems if I can get on here in the UAE...That's the only thing I did... This game doesn't really support left hand players as well, since so many buttons are set to be chat buttons and can't be reconfigured.
Maybe it's the area.
That's the only thing I did... This game doesn't really support left hand players as well, since so many buttons are set to be chat buttons and can't be reconfigured.
Maybe it's the BETA.
Hey guys. n.n
I don't... Play a lot of shooters, 'cause I'm not very competitive or anything. Still, I'm quite enjoying what I've played of the beta so far, but for the fact that I don't have anyone to play with. Has anyone thought about making a platoon yet? I'm having trouble finding any furry clans playing on the ps3. :/
Pro tip: Don't ever mix with people just because they're furry. Furry should never have to be a requirement for anything!
It isn't a requirement. They just tend to be nicer to me than the average FPS player I've met. =.=
In very general terms.
It isn't a requirement. They just tend to be nicer to me than the average FPS player I've met. =.=
In very general terms.
Bolded is actually very valid. A lot of your typical online FPS players tend to downtalk anyone with a lower K/DR or killcount than them. Never mind the fact that they're GAMES and those numbers don't really matter...
That's why I prefer to play games like Killing Floor with just friends. They are games after all, and the purpose of games is to have fun, but in the casual military FPS market, everyone seems to have forgotten that.
Actually, I agree with this.
Actually, I agree with this.
100 Players on a map made for 32? No. Just... No.
If EA aren't strict on this, it could turn into the travesty of mods that unlock everything on MW2 servers.
I still doubt a 100 player server would be very fun.But don't forget that the server owners are paying out the arse to run a server that supports 100 players and adds to the fun by putting the game forwards in its potential with modded servers, and EA are not allowing them to do so. Very different from the "modded" servers in MW2, which were more of a cheat than anything else.