• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

Club Like Accounts Aren't Allowed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

kuroookamitsume

Funky FoxSkunky.
The only club I know of, (Which the owner got banned as well) is GanjaArmy.

I already sent a warning out to TakoWolf to watch out that her club may be canceled next. She started SAIFurs. :(
 

Sasho

New Member
Could someone explain to me why groups that tout conservative values were banned but the liberal one's were not? Seems to be 'profiling' nothing on the group was incediary. I thought this was the united states that the site is based in, giving us the freedom to assemble and to say our mind
 

Devious Bane

No faith for this site
Banned
Could someone explain to me why groups that tout conservative values were banned but the liberal one's were not? Seems to be 'profiling' nothing on the group was incediary. I thought this was the united states that the site is based in, giving us the freedom to assemble and to say our mind
The mods half-assing their job/enforcement? It's not like all the group accounts they plan on banning are linked to one - ADLM.
 

Zalin

The One and Only
The groups banned included GanjaArmy, ConservativeFurs, GOPFurs, and the old AmericanFurs page.

GanjaArmy violated the rules quite clearly. The offense was well outlined and explained.

ConservativeFurs and GOPFurs were not provided an explanation. And notably, DNCFurs was left intact... Even though if this staff member who banned the page did their research, they would find it easy. Right on my page at the bottom of my comments was a comment by the maker of DNCFurs. And right at the bottom of the GOPFurs page was a series of comments (Since lost due to the flood of comments following our opening day)... Again advertising his political status. A quick inspection of his page shows DNC clear and visible. Not to mention the fact he made a post on the NRA page while on his DNC account.

And then AmericanFurs... I have no clue whats going on there. We got 2, so no big deal.
 

Armaetus

Nazis, Communists and Antifa don't belong on FA
What about these groups?

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/explosivefur
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/indianafur
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/damnitdrawinc
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/ganjaarmy (Banned, lol)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/anti-dramallamamovement
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/adlmdailyspotlight
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/michiganfurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/americanfurs (Not banned, if one is why not this one?)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/composers
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/mississippifurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/nevadafurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/newhampshirefurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/nmfurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/southdakotafurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/utah-furs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/virginiafurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/cleanartist
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/iloveyiff
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/spain
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/malefurry (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/femalefurry (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/tranfurry (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/gayfurry (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/lesbianfurry (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/bifurry (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/360furs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/wiifurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/ps3furs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/ps2furs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/pcfurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/gopfurs (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/conservativefurs (Banned)
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/ricanfurs
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/prfurries

Come on! We don't need all this shit!
 
Last edited:
K

Kaamos

Guest
What is ADLM? I've seen that mentioned twice in this thread and I've never heard about it before.
 

Lobo Roo

turtles natures suction cups
So, are all clubs being banned, or what? You know, either way there's nothing I can do about it, but consistency would be nice.

What about stuff like United Muscle Furs, that's actually there to post art? Are those next? I read through this thread without ever actually getting a clear idea of what the hell is going on.
 

Rigor Sardonicus

Banned
Banned
I read through this thread without ever actually getting a clear idea of what the hell is going on.
Sounds like a personal problem to me :V

According to tsawolf, art-related groups are allowed, while groups not art-related are not.
 

Rehka

Lab Mouse Extraordinar
I really wish an admin would post some sort of clarification here, on where the placename groups lay on this line at least. Arguably, the groups could bring people together who live in the same area to do artwork together, foster friendships and possibly produce more art.

But i suppose then, the question is where do you draw the line? seems like this line is a scribble across the site right now, with very picky-choosy enforcement.
 

OtakuMan24

Cat's Eye Clarity
You know guys... sometimes you take things way too far sometimes and get all worked up over nothing major. I mean it's the weekend! Let's try and relax!

Oh by the way, I'm Otaku-Man; founder of the ADLM (Anti-Drama Llama Movement). For those of you who are wondering, I just checked and the ADLM is NOT banned, and everything else looks good and frosty. My group's been around since the beginning of March, we've got over 500 members (not too shabby), and our goal is to just try and encourage people to do good around FA and help one another out. And as far as I know, the admins know about it and are okay with it so long as we don't start any trouble.

Speaking of admins, let's take a look back here at what tsawolf said about group accounts, noting that tsawolf IS an admin.

If I remember back to Administration 101, I believe that groups/clubs are permitted at the discretion of the administrative staff. Unlike normal accounts, they can be removed if there is any trouble surrounding it, even if it is not the fault of the group/club owner. The club/group may also be removed if an administrator believes there is the possibility of trouble surrounding the aforementioned, even if none has occurred. Additionally, there are no ban lengths or formal appeals, like there are for normal accounts. It's just... over.

What interests me most is this phrase:

"...are permitted at the discretion of the administrative staff."

In essence, if the admins are cool with the group, then it's all good. If there's a problem or the group can easily become a source of problems, then the group gets shut down.

As far as I know, there is no explicit rule under the TOS or AUP that says that group accounts aren't allowed. What's more is that the admins don't have an admin rulebook either. There's no strict set of guidelines, qualifications, or standards for the admins. It's all more or less played by ear.

But that's another story for another time. Let's take a look at why the groups that were banned were banned.

First, the AmericanFur group:

I'm not sure if you know this or not, but that's actually the SECOND American Fur group here on FA. The first was this one here:

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/americanfurs

This group was the first, but had some problems when the group account was taken over by one of the assitants going so far as to change the password. The guy who made the group then said "Forget it, I don't have time to deal with this, I'm out." So the other one, AmericanFur (singular tense), was formed by someone else as a means to fill the gap. For a while it was good, and it started collaborating to make a US state and territory list of groups made by other furs. Now these state groups are totally separate, not made by the same person, and help furs in a state find one other, organize furmeets, and generally have fun and hang out and be social.

(I for one encourage that.)

Now apparently there was some issue with this group that I honestly have no idea about. I wasn't there, I didn't hear anything, I couldn't tell yah. What I do know is that people went to the guy who made the ORIGINAL AmericanFurs (plural tense) group to come back, and after a while, he did!

So now we had TWO American Fur groups, and my GUESS (I don't know for certain) as to why this second group closed was because some folks didn't like it, and it was no longer necessary now that the original group was back up and running. I could be wrong, but that's my guess.

Second, the ConservativeFur group:

This one actually makes a bit more sense to me as to why it was shut down. Politics, along with religion, are two things that you NEVER EVER talk about with associates or people you don't know very well. They are often very divisive, argumentative, and are known for much mud-slinging. I personally don't mind if someone is a conservative, or a Republican, or whatever, just as long as they don't try and shove their platform or beliefs down my throat.

By having that group there, it was just begging for there to be journals, threads, and activities to promote political viewpoints here on FA, which is an ART community. If it was a political community with a city hall like forum, then that's one thing, but here it could easily lead to all kinds of trouble. Hence, why it was shut down.

Now I notice some of you mention that there's a democratic group as well which, at last check, wasn't shut down. I feel that if the conservative group was shut down, then that one should be too. No matter what side of politics it is, it can easily break apart friendships, relationships, and cause mud-slinging here on FA. If the democratic group hasn't been shut down by now, then it should be.

Third, and lastly, the GanjaArmy group:

This group really shouldn't come as a surprise. At last check, smoking weed is illegal, and is also a very strong topic of debate and argument. Until laws are passed that say otherwise, marijuana is a very, VERY difficult topic.

On the GanjaArmy group page, the administrator that closed it wrote that group accounts aren't allowed, but apparently, according to tsawolf, that is a mistake. The administrator who closed that account errored on that statement.

HOWEVER!

What they WERE right about was that posting photos of illegal paraphenalia IS illegal, and if left alone, could get FA into a lot of trouble. (Remember, as owner, everything falls on Dragoneer's head, so the last thing he wants is legal liability for what someone else does.) Whether the group was "NARCed" or not is rather moot. What matters is that the group was banned not so much because group accounts aren't allowed, but because what they were doing violated the law.

And that's no good.

Finally,

@Glaice

The regional groups are for furs to share what part of the world they live in and find and make new friends with other furs on FA who are in the vicinity. They can arrange gatherings, hang out, and be social.

The gender and orientation groups are so people don't confuse someone's characters with who they really are. You'd be surprised how many people think girls are guys and vice versa. It also helps when meeting other people. Whether straight or gay, sometimes a hook up happens here on FA. These groups just help eliminate some confusion.

The gaming and computer groups are for people to connect for social gaming. They can share GamerTags, Friend Codes, Network IDs, and the like so they can hook up, play games, and have fun. There's a lot of gamers on FA.

And lastly, CleanArtist and ILoveYiff are for people to state on whether they like their art clean or dirty. The two groups are good friends and encourage peace and harmony amongst those involved in a common FA argument: Does the furry fandom need an image makeover? If you aren't familiar with that, don't worry about it.

And...

@Rigor Sardonicus

I wouldn't say I'm so much of a kiss-ass as I am someone who just wants to go by FA's rules so I can keep doing what I want and like to do. Simple as that.

Okay, I'm done. Nothing else to see here folks, move along.

~Otaku-Man
 

Rigor Sardonicus

Banned
Banned

Rehka

Lab Mouse Extraordinar
D'oh >.< Missed that :p thanks ^^;
 

Dragoneer

Site Developer
Site Director
Administrator
so despite this subject coming up several times in the past, this is just all of a sudden being enforced?
Well, we've banned inappropriate groups when they're noticed and found out, but these things have a way of creeping up overnight like a meme.

Group/shared accounts, which post art, pictures or stories (in compliance with the rules) are fine. Always have been. The problem is that people are using "club" accounts in a "If you like peas +watch me and :embed: me on your page!" sort of way. We don't need "Fans of French Fries" on FA. That's the stuff that grotesquely waters a site down while providing zero content, and ends up nothing more than Facebook-like quiz spam. Over time, it wastes site resources.

The TOS will be updated to reflect our stance on groups next week.
 
Last edited:

OtakuMan24

Cat's Eye Clarity
Well, we've banned inappropriate groups when they're noticed and found out, but these things have a way of creeping up overnight like a meme.

Group/shared accounts, which post art, pictures or stories (in compliance with the rules) are fine. Always have been. The problem is that people are using "club" accounts in a "If you like peas +watch me and :embed: me on your page!" sort of way. We don't need "Fans of French Fries" on FA. That's the stuff that grotesquely waters a site with zero content, and ends up nothing more than Facebook-like quiz spam. Over time, it wastes site resources.

The TOS will be updated to reflect our stance on groups next week.

I'm actually really glad to see you popped in here, as there are a couple of questions I wanted to ask about groups that are close to me.

First, there's my group, the Anti-Drama Llama Movement. It's a group focused on helping out people around here on FA, and we've actually talked about it back in April/May. That was back when I was trying to do raffles and then learned that it was a big no-no and immediately ceased and desisted. Since then, I've focused on some other efforts and topics of discussion, and have been doing rather alright.

By these new TOS rules that will be written out next week, will my group be safe? Of course, the group has had art inspired by the group's efforts favorited and posted there, and also had quite a bit of writing done on there too. Without those, would the group be in danger, or is the fact that the group has a purpose be enough for it to exist?

I can see what you mean if a group only exists to have an icon that people post in their profiles. That might explain the reason the "Comment before you Favorite" group was banned. It doesn't post journals, have favorites, or offer any sort of submissions.

My other concern are the region based groups such as the one American fur group (the one that wasn't banned), the Europe based groups, state based groups, and the other ones. I think they serve a useful purpose by helping local furs meet one another, make new friends, and maybe even gather into local furmeets.

In short, would groups that actually serve a purpose, OTHER than providing an icon to post on someone's profile, be protected even if they don't post submissions regularly, but post journals and favorite often?

~Otaku-Man
 

Dragoneer

Site Developer
Site Director
Administrator
By these new TOS rules that will be written out next week, will my group be safe? Of course, the group has had art inspired by the group's efforts favorited and posted there, and also had quite a bit of writing done on there too. Without those, would the group be in danger, or is the fact that the group has a purpose be enough for it to exist?

...

My other concern are the region based groups such as the one American fur group (the one that wasn't banned), the Europe based groups, state based groups, and the other ones. I think they serve a useful purpose by helping local furs meet one another, make new friends, and maybe even gather into local furmeets.
I ask that you wait until the rule update comes out before worrying. We're aware of this (and certain other ramifications) and are working on writing the rules to work to be clear and concise.
 

OtakuMan24

Cat's Eye Clarity
I ask that you wait until the rule update comes out before worrying. We're aware of this (and certain other ramifications) and are working on writing the rules to work to be clear and concise.

Thanks. I appreciate that you're taking the time and effort to take this all into consideration. I know it's a tough job, but I also know that you're quite fair and understanding. I'll let my group members know about the update, and also tell them to wait and not worry until it happens.

Take care 'Neer.

~Otaku-Man
 

dmfalk

Member
The only thing here, is that some were using some of these club accounts to cause trouble, especially in terms of politics, especially in light of recent town-hall meeting disruptions and "tea parties" IRL-- And causing trouble, including inflammatory statements and the like, actually ARE against the rules spelled out in the TOS and AUP, as with any form of harassment.

Other than conducting questionable activities outside the scope of the site, I would think this should be the only limit placed upon club accounts.

No, I don't belong to any.

d.m.f.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top