LadyFromEast
Traditional Artist, Architect
So, this is an issue I've been over the fence with for some time already, and still haven't come up with the best solution as of yet. Hence, I decided to go out to the wider public and ask your opinion and views on the matter. Perhaps some of you have had a similar issue before.
When it comes to being a visual artist, having an online portfolio is often a must nowadays. It helps you showcase your art and often lets you organize it in ways you are unable to on art sites, and is free of comments, praiseful or not, and of statistics as well (in most cases). It is clean, understandable, proffessional, free of personal issues and to the point.
Things get a bit complicated however when you contribute to more than one, let's call it "field" for the time being, of art in general.
Bringing up my personal example, I'm an architect and interior designer as well as being an artist. While it is awesome to be all of the above and employers are often happy with that notion, sometimes even fascinated someone actually sticks to the old and mundane (yep, I have heared such opinions by employers and architects several times) traditional, there are some issues that come with it.
NSFW art of all sorts. This irks me most. Why?
Imagine you're an employer who has been given a portfolio of a person you might or might not hire, and want to see their work. While you might be only interested in architecture, other parts of the website might still catch your attention, and this is when the fun begins. As a proffessional, what would your reaction be if you stumbled upon, apart from, let's say, design-related items, also upon fairly ambiguous or straight up sexual artwork on your potential employee's portfolio?
Does it prove that the author is interested in and skilled in diverse fields, portraying him or her as an open-minded individual, or does it show the person is not a proffesional, who mixes and confuses art and design fields, and is additionally (please forgive me for the term) a lecher?
Should these things be kept together, but be tagged properly on the site, or maybe do they belong on different sub-websites alltogether? Perhaps the portfolios should be even divided into separate domains? What would be your approach on the matter?
I'm also not talking about art profiles, since these are a separate matter alltogether.
As I said before, I've been over the fence with this issue, even more so since I decided to open myself more to the furry community and offer the possibility of drawing NSFW art. While it is a big improvement and a step forward for me which makes me happy and proud, it also makes me bashful and unsure how to proceed with the matter portfolio-wise.
Proceeding to a real-life example, I am linking my portfolio here to show how it looks at present date (some parts still being under construction, for which I apologize).
milewska.weebly.com: Iwona J. Milewska Art & Design
What are your views on the matter and how such issues like this may be solved in a feasible manner?
Looking forward to your replies!
When it comes to being a visual artist, having an online portfolio is often a must nowadays. It helps you showcase your art and often lets you organize it in ways you are unable to on art sites, and is free of comments, praiseful or not, and of statistics as well (in most cases). It is clean, understandable, proffessional, free of personal issues and to the point.
Things get a bit complicated however when you contribute to more than one, let's call it "field" for the time being, of art in general.
Bringing up my personal example, I'm an architect and interior designer as well as being an artist. While it is awesome to be all of the above and employers are often happy with that notion, sometimes even fascinated someone actually sticks to the old and mundane (yep, I have heared such opinions by employers and architects several times) traditional, there are some issues that come with it.
NSFW art of all sorts. This irks me most. Why?
Imagine you're an employer who has been given a portfolio of a person you might or might not hire, and want to see their work. While you might be only interested in architecture, other parts of the website might still catch your attention, and this is when the fun begins. As a proffessional, what would your reaction be if you stumbled upon, apart from, let's say, design-related items, also upon fairly ambiguous or straight up sexual artwork on your potential employee's portfolio?
Does it prove that the author is interested in and skilled in diverse fields, portraying him or her as an open-minded individual, or does it show the person is not a proffesional, who mixes and confuses art and design fields, and is additionally (please forgive me for the term) a lecher?
Should these things be kept together, but be tagged properly on the site, or maybe do they belong on different sub-websites alltogether? Perhaps the portfolios should be even divided into separate domains? What would be your approach on the matter?
I'm also not talking about art profiles, since these are a separate matter alltogether.
As I said before, I've been over the fence with this issue, even more so since I decided to open myself more to the furry community and offer the possibility of drawing NSFW art. While it is a big improvement and a step forward for me which makes me happy and proud, it also makes me bashful and unsure how to proceed with the matter portfolio-wise.
Proceeding to a real-life example, I am linking my portfolio here to show how it looks at present date (some parts still being under construction, for which I apologize).
milewska.weebly.com: Iwona J. Milewska Art & Design
What are your views on the matter and how such issues like this may be solved in a feasible manner?
Looking forward to your replies!
Last edited: