Creating a Stable Diffusion Model

[AIMakerJonas]

Hi Everyone, for those of you into AI art and stable diffusion, I am starting work on a new model, and would be interested in any help.
The goal of this project is to create a fine tuned model that is far more adult, and kinkier than anything SD intended.
I am looking to cover both the realms of, photorealistic sex and kink, as well as those of the artistic kink worlds.
I am looking for as much help as possible to pull together the thousands of images required to make the model something special.
If you'd like to help, or have eyes on model releases, you can follow at the Discord.

 

[Crimcyan]

 

[AIMakerJonas]

Assuming you're trying to say it will be pickled... I'm sure there are ways to check for that, and I wouldn't go trying to do a big community push but rather just put a bunch out for unsuspecting people. Community building would be a stupid step, n'est pas?

 

[Pomorek]

 

[Pomorek]

If you thought this kind of idea would get traction on here - then you must have missed seeing the relevant AI art thread and figuring out the stances. And the fact that AI art got banned on the main site. That should give a clue.

 

[AIMakerJonas]

If you thought this kind of idea would get traction on here - then you must have missed seeing the relevant AI art thread and figuring out the stances. And the fact that AI art got banned on the main site. That should give a clue.

Thanks for that explanation, I will admit I am not overly familiar with the goings on of the community here, and certainly everyone is welcome to their opinion. I am also however not looking to post anything here, rather just build a tool. I am aware though of the general issue artists have with the concept and I get it, as an automation engineer by trade my very job is to remove the need for other peoples jobs. I honestly don't believe however that an AI will ever be able to take the place of a talented artist... though perhaps that is me being naïve.

 

[quoting_mungo]

Thanks for that explanation, I will admit I am not overly familiar with the goings on of the community here, and certainly everyone is welcome to their opinion. I am also however not looking to post anything here, rather just build a tool. I am aware though of the general issue artists have with the concept and I get it, as an automation engineer by trade my very job is to remove the need for other peoples jobs. I honestly don't believe however that an AI will ever be able to take the place of a talented artist... though perhaps that is me being naïve.

I can’t speak for every artist, but for me? It’s less about whether the generator can produce work that can compete with me, and more about how it goes about doing so. Generated work by its nature is drawing on preexisting work without being able to cite sources. So far I’ve yet to see a project that limits its training data to work in the public domain and/or work which has explicitly been released for use as training data by the rights holders, and you gave no indication that you had any intention of imposing that limitation on your data set, either.

 

[Deleted member 160111]

So far I’ve yet to see a project that limits its training data to work in the public domain and/or work which has explicitly been released for use as training data by the rights holders, and you gave no indication that you had any intention of imposing that limitation on your data set, either.

Especially if it's sexual content. You might think there are a lot of erotic pictures in the public domain, and other kinks? Well, yes, well, yes. As if not so. Such impudence.

 

[AIMakerJonas]

I get that concern, and you're right, in essence it is using the art of artists to compete with those artists, with no capability (atleast yet) to produce a single thing that is truly original, instead a mix of things learned from many places.

I have no personal interest in ever using an AI to produce art for profit, or even for showcasing as anything beyond an example of the ability of a tool. I am in this strictly for trying to enhance and showcase the abilities of an AI powered tool. With that said I also freely share what I create, and I can't in any way claim that nobody would ever think to use the tool in such a way. I absolutely get where you're coming from, and have no argument to your point or concerns, as they are absolutely valid. They are in fact one of many moral and ethical concerns regarding the powers of such AI tools.