As funny as it is to see steam blow out Pheagle's ears, I'm going to go ahead and bring us back on topic. There have been a few points raised that have some impact on the discussion and I feel that they're being missed.
First, IMVU requiring a SSN, credit card in-name, and regular selfies with photo ID to access AP content. That makes it even more difficult for artists to access the AP section of the site for the purposes of issuing DMCA requests.
Second, IMVU disallowing sexual displays / depictions of arousal / etc. That sounds fine, but there are two problems with that:
1) FurAffinity is rife with that.
2) So is IMVU's store.
Third, Dragoneer is being paid partly with money gained through sale of stolen artwork, but IMVU is unwilling to cooperate with artists who don't want to buy into their paywalled AP service in order to actually make a DMCA takedown. This is probably the most damning after considering the rest, because it ultimately shows that IMVU is actively attempting to make it as difficult as possible to remove stolen content from their storefront. For as strict as the rest of their policies appear to be, the glaring omission of any apparent policing of copyright in the store is a clear signal that they wish to profit from the content regardless, for as long as legally possible. It is literally not legal for a US company to do any less than respond to a DMCA claim, and they willfully are making it difficult to both search the store and access very likely more than half the applicable content for copyright holders to browse. That in itself may not even be legal, but IMVU clearly doesn't care where money is involved as long as nobody calls them out on it.