• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

Female Furs and Breasts

Willow

FAF's #1 Terrorist
Other mammals have multiple breasts, so that's where it comes from. It's another step away from humans on the anthro-scale, which is why it's on ferals more (from what I've seen).
Not that I like it. It's an instant turnoff for me, honestly.
People trying to put multiple breasts on cartoon animals is just creepy. Simple as that.
 

Ames

it smells like dust and moon light
I wonder.. how do you two feel about dragons with full-on breasts complete with nipples?

images


Why must they bring such evil upon the world?
 

Heimdal

has a sexy learning disability
I wonder.. how do you two feel about dragons with full-on breasts complete with nipples?

Female dragons without breasts are far more interesting. Probably because 99% of the ones depicted with breasts are used primarily for porn... whoop-dee-doo.
Dragons are awesome when they aren't depicted in a way that rapes my childhood.

Multi-breasts: when I'm looking at breasts I can't count higher than two, so multi-breasts are wasted. Also, they are gross.
 

Asswings

Banned
Banned
my least favorite is breasts on reptiles and birds... they dont have mammary glands dont give them tits.

Man I hate seeing animals drawn standing on two legs and with the toes on their front paws drawn out into fingers. They don't stand on two legs and have oposable thumbs don't stand them up and give them hands.

/satire, for you fuckwits who won't understand what I'm doing by just reading it.
 

footfoe

Beware of Molesters
I like it better when theres fur over the actual nipples, covering them. It just seems less weird.
 

ZiggyTheWolf

Waking up to a dream

Randy-Darkshade

Bike riding squirrel thing.
Yeah, really. I've never understood the hate for non-mammals with tits.

I mean, you're humanizing animals. Don't humans have tits?

Most humans don't have over sized airbags for tits. I've seen some characters in my time where their boobs would make good safety floatation devices.

Boobs vary from character to character, don't they?

Yes, just like they vary from human to human.
 

Bir

Dream a little dream of me..
As far as I'm concerned...

If you're mixing the characteristics of animals and humans together, you can have whatever the hell you want from each of the species featured on your character. Simple as that.

Birlioz, when in "anthro" form has a human shaped body and hands. I can't say much about her feet, because, well, they're pretty much not there, but her hands are human-hand shaped for playing the piano.. She however, does NOT have the human-face-slightly-morphed-to-kinda-of-look-like-a-creepy-ass-animal. She's pretty much all beast from the shoulders up. xD

And nipples. Ew. Birlioz's fur covers them.
 

GingerM

Appaloosa Horsegirl
I honestly don't see the problem with this thread... is a legit question. Artists have to draw the entire body. (Granted, you're not so likely to see questions about drawing hands here, but still.)

I'm kind of curious how multibreast would look now... I kind of like the idea because it's less attractive. Then again, my characters tend not to expose so much, so they might just look flat...

Most humans don't have over sized airbags for tits. I've seen some characters in my time where their boobs would make good safety floatation devices.
THIS. Just looks gross and weird to me when people draw like that...
 

Bir

Dream a little dream of me..
I honestly don't see the problem with this thread... is a legit question. Artists have to draw the entire body. (Granted, you're not so likely to see questions about drawing hands here, but still.)

I'm kind of curious how multibreast would look now... I kind of like the idea because it's less attractive. Then again, my characters tend not to expose so much, so they might just look flat...


THIS. Just looks gross and weird to me when people draw like that...

I kind of like things that are unusual, too.

I think the next time I draw something, it's going to have multibreasts. Then I'll post it and count how many people end up hating me. xD

But airbagtits are nasty. Seriously. And then when the nipples are so large they're erections themselves... iegughghgh.
 

Randy-Darkshade

Bike riding squirrel thing.
I kind of like things that are unusual, too.

I think the next time I draw something, it's going to have multibreasts. Then I'll post it and count how many people end up hating me. xD

But airbagtits are nasty. Seriously. And then when the nipples are so large they're erections themselves... iegughghgh.

I had big nipples too.
 

Stratelier

Well-Known Member
Form follows function, both on the presence of breasts and the number of.

Specifically, the number of breasts is generally proportional to the size of their average litter. So unless you seriously expect a female anthro to birth half a dozen babies at once, one pair is probably enough to go around. Otherwise, honestly, most of the mammaries would be sitting there unused.

Another overlooked point is that if you want to ply to the animal qualities of the anthro, many female animals don't even lactate until they give birth, ergo a non-nursing female (and especially a virgin) probably won't have visible breasts to begin with. (If you really need the visual aid, a well-coiffed "ruff" of thick fur around the chest comes in handy here.)

For example.
 

Willow

FAF's #1 Terrorist
Last edited:
Top