Human/human art

[PKBitchGirl]

Is human/human erotic artwork allowed here?

 

[Rytes]

...yes

so long they have hair to be counted "furry"

 

[AlexInsane]

HYOOMANZ?! IN MY FA?!









Sure. Why the hell not.

 

[Xaerun]

Yes.
...As long as it's not photography, IIRC.

 

[PKBitchGirl]

So, why is it allowed in art, but not in photography?

 

[Hertial]

Do you Draw humans well? If So Id like to talk to you!

 

[PKBitchGirl]

I'm not asking if human/human art is allowed here because I've got art I want to upload

I just wanted clarification, if it wasn't allowed, there was a piece I was going to report

 

[HoneyPup]

So, why is it allowed in art, but not in photography?

Could you imagine if it was? This place would be loaded with homemade porn! Or at least pictures of penises. :shock:

Art, on the other hand, allows for better expression of creativity.

 

[PKBitchGirl]

Could you imagine if it was? This place would be loaded with homemade porn! Or at least pictures of penises. :shock:

Shudders, full of cocks with shoes hanging off them like DA

DA: "We dont like the sexxor, but please feel free to post pics of your GF with her legs spread"

 

[pkingsora]

I pose lots of humans on my gallery (since i have a DA gallery) :3 i figure its coolio...x w x and I agree on the photography.. some photos on DA are just...........*shakes head*

 

[Armaetus]

Be happy that Dragoneer is pulling a Y!Gallery on you, OP.

 

[Nanakisan]

Shudders, full of cocks with shoes hanging off them like DA

DA: "We dont like the sexxor, but please feel free to post pics of your GF with her legs spread"

you apparently haven;t seen http://www.flickr.com/
yet. that place has more cock and bush for free then there is prons on the internet at those pay sites.....its scary.

 

[RailRide]

So, why is it allowed in art, but not in photography?

The real reason is that otherwise, the site owners would have to keep extensive proof of age, model release forms, and other documentation of the people appearing in the photos as proof that they are:
(1) not minors, and
(2) they've give permission to have their images used in such a manner (but really, it's mostly about (1) )

No such legal requirements for artwork, no matter how nasty (for now, anyway)

---PCJ

 

[krisCrash]

and the second reason is that many of us think its awesome to have an art site that isn't overrun with webcam shots of someone's nipple.

Also yes, it's allowed, so are landscapes etc., people don't even seem to mind.

 

[Dragoneer]

So, why is it allowed in art, but not in photography?

Legal reasons.

Besides, if you want real life porn there are plenty of sites out that offer that.

 

[oniontrain]

...yes

so long they have hair to be counted "furry"

Yeah, fuck them Baldies.