• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

If Sony bought Nintendo?

Would it be good if Sony bought Nintendo

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • No

    Votes: 11 84.6%

  • Total voters
    13

TransformerRobot

Robot in disguise
Not that I think this would happen, but what if Sony bought Nintendo?

I have a feeling it would turn out shitty and Nintendo would find themselves buried.
 

DarrylWolf

Banned
Banned
Nintendo needs to absolutely maintain its independence from its rivals at all costs. As much as Xbox and PlayStation owners would love to have that family-friendly image and ability to tap into nostalgia, Nintendo should continue to sell its own software. We've seen how Sega has become hit-or-miss after leaving the console industry in 2002 and I don't want the next Mario games to be like that. That said, if Nintendo would sell its franchises to mobile game companies they might make enough money to stave off bankruptcy AND remain relevant in the eyes of gamers.
 
I don't think it would work out too well for either company, except Sony could possibly help keep Nintendo afloat, but I really don't care that much either way. My 3DS was a Christmas present, and it's collected more pounds of dust than I have games. My last Sony gaming product was the PS1 - When it first came out. If only for the sake of competition, do I think the two companies should continue existing as game companies, and if it takes one owning the other, then *shrug* whatever.
 

Kangamutt

Well-Known Member
It could be a real neat thing, taking hardware and technology into consideration. Nintendo has some neat hardware ideas, however, much of them are more geared toward Japan, such as Street Pass features within games. It seems awesome, two players pass on the street, maybe having the same game in the slot, and a game breaks out. But there aren't a lot of places that have such a high population density like the major cities of Japan. Sony on the other hand looks to have a better idea of what people outside of the Japanese market wants which is why they seem to steamroll in each generation, especially this one. Plus, both are playing the touch-sensitive controller in wildly different ways. The WiiU/3DS uses a secondary screen with touch capabilities to manage things such as inventories and maps, while PS4/PSVita is utilizing a touchpad as extra buttons. More so, Sony has toyed with a sorts-of secondary screen through the use of the player's smart phone, turning it into an almost real-life version of Big Boss' iDroid through an app and syncing it with the player while in MGSV:GZ.

As far as games/software, that is up in the air. Nintendo could still work on its own accord as far as games, taking the family-friendly and nostalgia face for Sony while they work on more mature demographics. But it could fall the other way like Darryl said, and Nintendo becomes a hollow shell of its former self, desperately throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks which is what Sega has been seeming to do with Sonic since the fall of the Dreamcast.
 

TransformerRobot

Robot in disguise
It could be a real neat thing, taking hardware and technology into consideration. Nintendo has some neat hardware ideas, however, much of them are more geared toward Japan, such as Street Pass features within games. It seems awesome, two players pass on the street, maybe having the same game in the slot, and a game breaks out. But there aren't a lot of places that have such a high population density like the major cities of Japan. Sony on the other hand looks to have a better idea of what people outside of the Japanese market wants which is why they seem to steamroll in each generation, especially this one. Plus, both are playing the touch-sensitive controller in wildly different ways. The WiiU/3DS uses a secondary screen with touch capabilities to manage things such as inventories and maps, while PS4/PSVita is utilizing a touchpad as extra buttons. More so, Sony has toyed with a sorts-of secondary screen through the use of the player's smart phone, turning it into an almost real-life version of Big Boss' iDroid through an app and syncing it with the player while in MGSV:GZ.

As far as games/software, that is up in the air. Nintendo could still work on its own accord as far as games, taking the family-friendly and nostalgia face for Sony while they work on more mature demographics. But it could fall the other way like Darryl said, and Nintendo becomes a hollow shell of its former self, desperately throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks which is what Sega has been seeming to do with Sonic since the fall of the Dreamcast.

It would be nice, if that's how it would work out in the end.

Another reason I worry about Sony burying Nintendo in the merger is 1. Things fell apart between them over the CD-i fiasco, 2. Burying Nintendo would mean we'd never see Mario and company again (Unless there are legal reasons preventing them from doing that).

Not to mention Nintendo's demand for most, if not all, creative control with their own characters.
 

Kino-Fisk

New Member
Out of the question since Sony's been bleeding money and can hardly keep their own operations afloat.

Despite weak sales of the Wii U and Nintendo being exclusively a game company they currently have a greater net worth than the Sony corporation.
 

Nekokami

As cuckoo as a clock.
We've seen what happened with Rare and SEGA.
Do we really want Nintendo to go the way of Rare, where most of their games are ruined? Or the way of SEGA, where they stop making consoles and become mediocre?
 

PastryOfApathy

Well-Known Member
TR, what's with you and your Nintendo/Sony fetish? Are you like a shipper who finds Kazuo Hirai and Iwata like a perfect couple and are desperately attempting to get them together? I mean if it is there's no shame in admitting it, I mean we are on a website which has a "watersports" category.
 

TransformerRobot

Robot in disguise
Because I'm anxious about the future, what with Nintendo's financial woes thanks to Iwata's 2012-13 bungling, which are still being felt today. >.<
 

Kino-Fisk

New Member
Because I'm anxious about the future, what with Nintendo's financial woes thanks to Iwata's 2012-13 bungling, which are still being felt today. >.<

No need to worry about Iwata for the immediate future. Nintendo made so much money during the last console generation that they could continue losing money at this rate and still be afloat in 2050. If things don't turn around they'll replace Iwata long before that time comes.

There is a far greater chance of Sony going bankrupt in the next 10 years and having to sell the PlayStation division to another corporation than Sony scraping up the money to buy a company as large as Nintendo. Even if Sony had money to spare, it would be far easier to buy Capcom, Sega, and EA (all at once!) than Nintendo.
 
Last edited:

TransformerRobot

Robot in disguise
Hmm, maybe if THAT happened Nintendo could buy the PlayStation brand, but I don't know if they'd want to considering Sony's IPs are more gritty and mature (God of War and The Last of Us say hi).

Then again, Nintendo accidentally created the PS1 when they broke off with Sony to make those shitty CD-i Mario and Zelda games.
 

Kino-Fisk

New Member
Hmm, maybe if THAT happened Nintendo could buy the PlayStation brand, but I don't know if they'd want to considering Sony's IPs are more gritty and mature (God of War and The Last of Us say hi).

Then again, Nintendo accidentally created the PS1 when they broke off with Sony to make those shitty CD-i Mario and Zelda games.

That's actually correct. These are all huge hypothetical, but in Sony's current state Nintendo would be in a better position to buy PlayStation than the other way around. Sony's PS4 is doing great, but they're a corporation and as a whole they've been bleeding money for years (because companies like Samsung and Apple took over the markets Sony was once king in).

Video games are a major face of Sony, but the profits they make off video games are minuscule in the grand scheme of things. PS4 can continue its dominance, but it won't be nearly enough to turn things around for the corporation as a whole.
 

Kaedal

Punny User Title
They'll need a lot more than just one console to turn it around. It's a curious decision to keep their console department around, because it doesn't look like it's making a ton of money compared to the rest of their ventures. They have, what, music labels, cameras, phones, TVs and radios? I wonder where their consoles are ranked compared to those other departments, in terms of profit. That is, of course, counting games, but I don't know how big a share of the sales Sony snatches from those.

Being bought by Nintendo would, at least, put an interesting spin on their games. But I suspect it would do more damage in the long run, at least for the games. Nintendo is associated with family friendly, pick-up-and-play games. Not grungy, serious games as Sony carries. That's not to say Nintendo doesn't have its fair share of dark games, but it's not what they're renowned for. I imagine the sudden shift in image would confuse people too much. Same thing the other way around. People would hesitate to buy a Nintendo game published through Sony's brands, because they have different expectations.
 
Last edited:

CaptainCool

Lady of the lake
Sony buying Nintendo? With what? They are broke! They made a loss of 2 billion dollars during this fiscal year!
Nintendo on the other hand still has a ton of cash in the bank. They made mistakes, but they are far from being in a position in which they would be bought.

You need to stop seeing Sony as the Playstation company. They are a HUGE conglomerate, the Playstation is just one of their products. And the Playstation also happens to be one of their only products that is selling well right now.
If anything it would be the other way around. If Sony keeps going like that they will be finished within a few years from now and maybe then the Playstation department will be bought up by Microsoft or Nintendo. But I highly doubt that...
 

TransformerRobot

Robot in disguise
That's actually correct. These are all huge hypothetical, but in Sony's current state Nintendo would be in a better position to buy PlayStation than the other way around. Sony's PS4 is doing great, but they're a corporation and as a whole they've been bleeding money for years (because companies like Samsung and Apple took over the markets Sony was once king in).

Video games are a major face of Sony, but the profits they make off video games are minuscule in the grand scheme of things. PS4 can continue its dominance, but it won't be nearly enough to turn things around for the corporation as a whole.

Are you sure? It's a healthy looking console dominance to me.
 

CaptainCool

Lady of the lake
Are you sure? It's a healthy looking console dominance to me.

THE PS4 DOESN'T MATTER FOR SONY AS A WHOLE!
As I said above, they are a CORPORATION! A conglomerate! They don't just sell the PS4, they also sell smartphones, PCs, TVs, laptops, components for other manufacturers, cameras, entertainment systems, they have a movie studio... The list goes on and on and on. And as it stands right now the only product that is selling right now for them is the PS4. So who cares if they make a few hundred million dollars with the PS4 when the company as a whole made a net loss of 2.1 billion dollars?! Their smartphone branch alone contributed 1.6 billion bucks to that loss.

I said that in my previous post, you only see the Playstation. Yes, that thing is currently dominating the console market. But Sony isn't just Playstation! It is a massive company that is, as Kino said, bleeding money. They are broke and dying and that has been the case for years! If the PS4 suddenly stops selling the way it does right now because of market saturation or what ever else Sony is in some REALLY deep shit.
If they keep going like they do now the company won't exist anymore within the next few years, at least not in its current form.
 

Fernin

6150 rpm and spinning.
I could care less either way. I just a new Metroid game, both traditional AND Prime.
 

CaptainCool

Lady of the lake
I just find it funny that people think that Sony is the god of console gaming when in truth they are doing worse financially than their competition :p
 

Kino-Fisk

New Member
Are you sure? It's a healthy looking console dominance to me.

PlayStation doesn't make nearly enough to save Sony as a whole. Despite the explosive sales of the PS4 Kaz Harai had to walk up to Sony's investors and say they've lost 2.1 BILLION DOLLARS this past fiscal year (way higher than the originally predicted $700 million loss Kaz had previously foretold).

Unless Sony finds the next Halo (a first party, console exclusive franchise that can consistently move 10+ million copies) their PlayStation division alone won't be nearly enough to help the corporation in the grand scheme of things. Even then, I don't think PlayStation alone is large enough to support a corporation of Sony's size. If every other branch continues to decline all the PS4's in the world won't be able to save Sony.
 

TransformerRobot

Robot in disguise
*blissfully looking forward to a possible Nintendo acquisition of PlayStation*

Well, it could be the best for both parties. ^^

Think of all the big opportunities that would bring about?

We could have a Link cameo in the next God of War with no trademark problems, or Jak & Daxter joining Smash Bros. (assuming we ever get another Jak game).
 

Fernin

6150 rpm and spinning.
We could have a Link cameo in the next God of War

That would be literally one of the stupidest things I can imagine happening in GoW. And speaking of cameos, that reminds me of the one of the most annoying things about Nintendo, shoehorning their golden trio characters into every game they can, irregardless of how poorly they fit the game.
 

Shànwàng

Lavender Scented
I could care less either way. I just a new Metroid game, both traditional AND Prime.

Fuck yeah to both those.

Anyways, Sony couldn't afford Nintendo. At best, Sony could attempt a hostile takeover and acquire majority share in Nintendo's stock but I think Sony would be paying for stock way too highly valued that they couldn't make a profit back on. Nintendo has longevity, it's not just consoles that Nintendo sells (Sega's major weakness), Nintendo is an entertainment conglomerate that's move their IP's in ways that just prints money. Movies, TV shows, books, comics, all based around their characters. It'll take more than weak console sales to sink Nintendo.
 
Top