Fallowfox
Are we moomin, or are we dancer?
I'm straying from the original discussion so I'm going to put my post in a spoilerRead my first post again carefully.
Are you familiar with the concept that you can't prove a negative?
There's not really any evolutionary reason for disposable organisms to have immortal personalities- because the abstract persistence of an organism's personality after death doesn't aid its survival and reproduction. Indeed, the fact that animals' ability to maintain consciousness can be damaged when they are injured probably shows that it's completely transient.
Still, you can't prove the claim 'organisms' personalities don't persist after death' because it's a negative, which is why, if there truly is no ghost in the shell, this question can never be answered scientifically.
That's why people who portend to tell others about quantum explanations for ghosts or reincarnation aren't really being responsible; this just isn't a question that can be engaged scientifically, and they risk promoting misunderstandings about physics by proliferating unfalsifiable (but almost certainly false) claims, that can't possible be supported by current science- and probably can't ever be supported.
There's not really any evolutionary reason for disposable organisms to have immortal personalities- because the abstract persistence of an organism's personality after death doesn't aid its survival and reproduction. Indeed, the fact that animals' ability to maintain consciousness can be damaged when they are injured probably shows that it's completely transient.
Still, you can't prove the claim 'organisms' personalities don't persist after death' because it's a negative, which is why, if there truly is no ghost in the shell, this question can never be answered scientifically.
That's why people who portend to tell others about quantum explanations for ghosts or reincarnation aren't really being responsible; this just isn't a question that can be engaged scientifically, and they risk promoting misunderstandings about physics by proliferating unfalsifiable (but almost certainly false) claims, that can't possible be supported by current science- and probably can't ever be supported.
Regarding the original thread topic, I'm definitely enjoying being reminded of my mortality every time I pop in on this thread!