My GF says that fursuiting is the same as blackface and that it's not okay because animals can't consent to us using their image as anthro creatures. Discuss
I do not think it is okay to start calling her names or dismissing her arguments out of hand like some people have done in this thread.
The first attempt should always be to have a rational discussion, treat the person with respect, give them the benefit of the doubt, and engage and treat their position fairly to see if they perhaps have a point.
Blackfacing is simply using makeup or other methods to make a non-black person appear to be black. There is nothing inherently wrong with doing this. The objections here come from a person who is blackfacing publicly acting in a way that promotes stereotypes which are often racist in nature.
This shows us that the problem with blackfacing has nothing to do with consent. Therefore her argument of drawing an analogy to blackfacing and adding that animals are unable to consent, immediately falls flat on its face because it entirely misses the actual objectionable problem with blackfacing.
That's basically what I tell her but she then says "is it okay to exploit them when they don't know what's going on"
Her argument here takes a turn for the worse and jumps right into a complex question fallacy. She assumes from the start that dressing in a fursuit is in fact an exploitation of animals, without providing an argument to back that position up. She needs to first show why it is animal exploitation before you need to bother defending why it is not.
I know and it's driving me crazy! She's a lot better at debating than I am to so no matter what I say she has a way to turn it around and make me seem like the bad guy while I'm just thinking "it's cartoon animals please chill"
It is perfectly fine to not have an answer on the spot for everything.
Simply tell her "That is an interesting point, give me some time to consider it, I will get back to you tomorrow". Then go and do your research, ask people like you have done here, and then take the answer that you feel is best back to her.
Answer each claim separately and do not allow her to bombard you with a million different angles at once that simply muddy the waters and get you all twisted up. Write down specifically what her claim is, have her double check it and agree to it, then go and figure out what your answer to that particular claim is.
She's always been regularly interested and properly supportive in animal/women's/human rights and stuff like that and I was very happy to find somebody regular that shared the same not radical views as I did. That's why her getting so upset about something like this is really weird and kind of upsetting for me. The way she is arguing it is that in the future animals might have consciousness like humans do but until them fursuiting is not okay because it takes advantage of their lack of consciousness and while what she says makes sense, it's just... really unimportant...
That is an attitude that you should never have in a relationship, if it matters to her, then it is not unimportant.