Including you.
The truth hurts...
Including you.
...like a kick in the balls or a punch in the gut?The truth hurts...
...like a kick in the balls or a punch in the gut?
please note both are done by Captain Falcon
@_@...Closer to a kick in the balls, IMO.
http://www.exitmundi.nl/giggle.htm
http://www.exitmundi.nl/Sperm problem.htm
You want to get your knickers in a twist about the fate of the males of the human race, look at those. <3 Exit Mundi.
Late, but to me this sounds like another OMG PANIC thing, like the particle accelerator or something I read about where this years Halloween candy would kill THOUSANDS.
cause Gordon Freeman was there...thats why it didnt end the worldLate, but to me this sounds like another OMG PANIC thing, like the particle accelerator or something I read about where this years Halloween candy would kill THOUSANDS.
...like a kick in the balls or a punch in the gut?
please note both are done by Captain Falcon
then this universe and our parallel would endHow about both at the same time?
... "gender-benders" ...
this article is making my eyes bleed. I'm studying environmental engineering, which includes, among other things, a heavy focus on endocrine disruptors. please, go read a real source after this. Yes, it's a problem, but this article is bad - really bad.
Yeah, it's BS. this article is just...you know. Plus the thing with the small penis doesn't make sense. You are a man, not matter how big that thing down there is. Penis + testicles = Manhood!
But if the equipment is firing blanks, it's pretty much useless for its intended purpose. Also, I've noticed quite a few people not noting the damage being done to animal populations, and instead focusing on the article's title or the sexist angle. We already know how much chemical contamination affects wildlife, such as the fragile eggshell problems suffered by the Bald Eagle. So, it is quite possible such effects, as mentioned in this article, could indeed be more widespread than we think. Just because you believe something isn't true doesn't make it so (however, more info always helps)....
It's not the size of your ding dong that matters, it's how you use it.
It's not the size of your ding dong that matters, it's how you use it.
Small peen alert! *alarms sound* jk lol
Rubbish. If anything, the reason for all of this is that males have lost their MANLINESS. Gone are the days of violent physical combat. Gone is the man who farmed the land, tended the livestock and built his home with his own hands. Gone are the years of hard, rewarding labor. Men are no longer carved from the marble of the Earth, but reared and raised as a potted plant. He does not survive the harshness of his world by means of his strength and indomitable spirit. Rather, he is spared these "hardships" and cared for by the devices of his intellect. But oh, he toils... and no longer does his body grow in strength from his work... but his spirit breaks and his body fails... leaving not but a weak, monomorphic husk; testament to the future of Mankind.
I do not mean to denounce technology, but everything has a price...
*edit* And I find it laughable that, by using the results of FISH and AMPHIBIANS, these scientists come to the conclusion that it certainly MUST be affecting every male. While there is truth to the effects of chemicals, this article is politically fueled and I find it an abomination to Science.
Yeah, no, I'm just not feeling it. Just not.It's not the size of your ding dong that matters, it's how you use it.