They've also said (at least elsewhere) that the old style while selectable won't necessarily have support for (all?) new features.Once again: the admins/mods have already said that you will be able to use the old style if you don't like the new one.
The specific feedback would be more useful if we weren't looking at a mock-up that's over a year old. For all we know, it looks almost nothing like the pic in the OP.They've also said (at least elsewhere) that the old style while selectable won't necessarily have support for (all?) new features.
Aside from people saying "it looks like X site" there have also been people giving specific feedback, in this thread, such as "I like Y aspect but not Z aspect" or "could you do A in B way instead" or similar. That's hardly redundant or useless in any design process.
Oh that's interesting. I hate how DA changed their look. I like the FA look we're having now cuz' its simple and easy to go around. DA slows everything down. But what's weird is that has this site actually had that "new DA 7" look and changed it? How come it doesn't look like that now?
I will take any user interface that looks even slightly better than the one we have now. That picture is a major improvement.
CorrectedAt the very least... please tell me it won't be AJAX-based like DA is..? I wouldn't hardly be able to browse if it was..
CALM DOWN EVERYONE the site was attacked by malicious software and this was caused by the emergency procedure that the staff had to do to get rid of it. Its suppose to change back though.