(NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspects

[Kalmor]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Do any creatures naturally have them but humans? I mean, mammals nurse and have live young and all that, but boobs are a pretty strictly human thing.

Mammary glands, all female mammals have them and it's one of the defining features that makes a mammal, a mammal.

 

[BlueStreak98]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Mammary glands, all female mammals have them and it's one of the defining features that makes a mammal, a mammal.

This is true. I struggle a bit with non-mammal furs anyway, so I suppose I didn't think of it that way. Dragons are a whole other story, of course.

 

[sunandshadow]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

If I'm designing a species or character, I design them to be attractive according to my personal standards and taste. I'm a human, and I'm generally more attracted to human bodies than animal ones (aside from our sad lack of tails, wings, and mobile ears). It would be more surprising if many humans didn't prefer human genitals and chests.

 

[Kalmor]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

This is true. I struggle a bit with non-mammal furs anyway, so I suppose I didn't think of it that way. Dragons are a whole other story, of course.

I still like female dragons to have no boobs though, as they're technically reptile. There are other ways for an artist to distinguish between the male and the female of a non-mammal species, apart from the obvious of course.

 

[moonstone_dreamer]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Well, for me it'd be a little hard to have species-accurate genitalia!
Insects in general are kind of weird that way. I'd give female insects mostly human-looking genitals, but with males I'm a bit more flexible. Probably a somewhat scaly/segmented look, but not TOO crazy. I admit I have a thing for xenobiology!

Edit: I draw moths with big poofy chest fur/hair, so there's not much visible difference between genders, chest-wise. No nipples, no belly button.

 

[Saiko]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

I myself like both human and "anatomically correct" genitalia, so it depends more on the artist's style. Generally I prefer realistic styles to be more accurate to the species and toony styles to be more humanoid. Outside of that context, the distinction makes no difference to me.

 

[Ramses]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

What I don't personally enjoy is anthro canines where the penis is held up by a fold of skin, as in real-life dogs. I prefer an anthro penis to dangle as on a human male.

I agree. That fold doesn't look . . . . practical. I look at that, and I think - how would that actually work? On a human-like, anthro canine.

My sona is an anthro who walks on two legs, so, his penis dangles, like mine. It would be different if my sona were more like an actual wolf (like my pic) - 'cause then he would have wolfish genitalia.

Is it just me, or is "Wolfish Genitalia" a great name for a band?

 

[Fallowfox]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

I agree. That fold doesn't look . . . . practical. I look at that, and I think - how would that actually work? On a human-like, anthro canine.

My sona is an anthro who walks on two legs, so, his penis dangles, like mine. It would be different if my sona were more like an actual wolf (like my pic) - 'cause then he would have wolfish genitalia.

Is it just me, or is "Wolfish Genitalia" a great name for a band?

It's a brand of condoms that nobody can use.

Why can't they use them?

They all have knots in them.

 

[Schwimmwagen]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Dogdong is just too much on the wrong side for my liking...

I don't really think much about my OC's cocks anyway. But they'd be humany no doubt.

 

[Fallowfox]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

I really don't get the huge proportion of animal genitals in this fandom. It makes a little bit of sick come up when I think about it.

 

[Vaelarsa]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

No genitalia, because shit's gross as fuck.

 

[Fallowfox]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

No genitalia, because shit's gross as fuck.

Having no genitals is even more disturbing. e_O

 

[Tigercougar]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

I really don't get the huge proportion of animal genitals in this fandom. It makes a little bit of sick come up when I think about it.

Well the character IS an animal to a degree, so I can see how some people want their characters to have as much animal anatomy as possible. It's just a fetish, nothing to be concerned about.

 

[Vaelarsa]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Having no genitals is even more disturbing. e_O

I'd much rather look at a character that is like a Ken doll in terms of anatomy.
But I don't like characters, especially furry characters, in terms of sexuality.
And I don't need to be able to verify that the character would in fact be able to piss / shit.

 

[moonstone_dreamer]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

I don't have a problem with the animal genitalia. I mean, you can buy a horse dildo at your average erotic boutique, and there are other crazy looking ones too!
I know that I'm not sexually attracted to 100% animals, so I don't worry about it C::
It's not at all uncommon to wonder what something like that would feel like. ^^

 

[BRN]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Pokefag here.


I think splitting genital styles into "human" and "animal" is a false dichotomy. It's a sensual object on a fantasy creature, and when you're having to describe it, anyone can guess what you're trying to achieve.

Some people find ridges, bumps, and exotic shapes to be arousing. Simply put, I'm one of them. It's that same logic that can lead someone to be attracted to the shapes that a real-life animal might also share - and the link that some people find uncomfortable is that animals might actually be sources of inspiration for new ideas.

However, I really don't see why that's a problem. Exotic genitals can be attractive, and so can human genitals. From my perspective, the choice is just one more aspect of a fursona, like distinctive ears or colouring; it's just the carnal part of them that appeals to what's attractive - and even more simply put, imagining how some more exotic stuff must feel can be pretty attractive.


ED:

It's not at all uncommon to wonder what something like that would feel like. ^^

Yeah, pretty much this.

 

[Hakar Kerarmor]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

I prefer human genitalia. When I'm wanking off to anthropomorphic wolves having an orgy, the last thing I need is the idea that it might be bestiality.
And whether it is is off course determined by the shape of the naughty bits, and nothing else.

 

[Kio Maru]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Depends on the artist, I think (for example, I think characters with more realistic elements like fur would benefit from non-animal genitalia). I don't think human genitalia works on some more natural looking non-humans; but the closer the chara is to looking human the more the non-human genitalia looks odd on the chara. Non-human genitalia has a fetish appeal due to its sometimes more pleasing shape and/or size to plenty.
I'd say it's not so much a case of the genitalia as how good it looks like it would be. I don't like seeing human-like boobs on furry characters (and like a tuft of fur there instead) but then I don't like boobs much anyway and when they are really big it just looks like tumorous growths to me like there's this sickly gross fluid inside waiting to pop, it makes me cringe. I don't see why there's so much of a bestiality association here, bestiality is bad because it you don't know if its damaging to an animal because they cannot consent and it's generally also far less clean; furry characters are fictional to observe the porn of such would be formally classed as a form of faunoiphilia than outright zoophilia, and roleplay would be considered as autozoophilia. Overall, it's just an exotic kink, in fact I'm pretty sure genuine erotic zoophiles would rather be with their "pet" than looking at furry erotica...

Though, I'm not that big into sexuality, tbh, if sex was banned from the Earth/furrydom, I wouldn't cry.

 

[Fallowfox]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Well the character IS an animal to a degree, so I can see how some people want their characters to have as much animal anatomy as possible. It's just a fetish, nothing to be concerned about.

I understand that it's my personal taste I find it gross, specifically anything that has large lumps in it if you want that mental image.

 

[Batty Krueger]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Mine is a mix of human and animal because that's what I like. Full animal on more realistic art styles.

 

[PapayaShark]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Full animal on more realistic art styles.

Reminds me of an artist who posted a clean version of her drawing and a guy came and bawwed on it because the adult one had human penis And he felt that he had the right to have animal dick on the porn he wanted to wank to :S

 

[Batty Krueger]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Heheheh, what a wanker.

 

[Ramses]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

I prefer human genitalia. When I'm wanking off to anthropomorphic wolves having an orgy, the last thing I need is the idea that it might be bestiality.

The last thing I need - in that situation - is my roomie coming home earlier than expected.

 

[Ryu Deacon]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Sorry for late response, was knocked out this weekend...

anyways some replies from me not that the owners will set foot on this Thread again...

@Aubreys: Speaking realistic Intersex goods, do you mean more truly androgyne Aspects in Intersex Furs and less Female and Macro oriented, Ambigious Gentalia like irl and Not the perfect functioning separation as portrayed in modern Fiction or something else?

@Growlmon: So touching on a odd and for many uncomfortable Subject is immature, allllrrright...............

@Ricky: whatever floats your boat ricky, don't find what's weird though, If one is going go into detail on the Furcoat or Personality (for example) of the Character then miswell do it completly and not "halfass". Oh Society and its Tabu's...


Thanks everyone for the responses so far, most were understandable and others very interestingly informative. Just to point out through, i don't care that much for sexuality, i just like being detailed and realistic in all Area’s of the Character also those that might be ridiculous or uncomfortable to others but again to whose evers taste

Oh Just for some clarification on from a few replys, how is masturbating or having an Interest to Images depicting fictional Anthropomorphic Animals(and/or with species specific Genitalia) a act of bestiality, i always thought that would only mean as the Act of actually forcibly raping a real Animal?

PS: This is a generalized Thread not specifically aimed on Canines, no discrimination against Dragons and others ment, but please continue

 

[Rheumatism]

Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe

Gotta be human genitalia. It's the only right answer.