(NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspects
- Thread starter Ryu Deacon
- Start date
Ricky
Well-Known Member
Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe
... animal dicks :roll:
... animal dicks :roll:
Nataku
Shapeshifting alien dragon
Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe
All of my art adheres to the wookie rule. Genitalia is covered in fur (or feathers, or scales, species depending) so as far as I'm concerned its not really there. There are plenty of other ways to depict male vs female if its that important anyhow. Being as I'm not into the sexual side of the fandom, its really not something I have a preference for in art.
Strictly anatomically speaking, Nataku the dragon has a vent covered in scales and any genitalia she may possess is carried inside the body and not seen. My other two fursonas, one being canine, and one feline, are both covered in fur, and I've honestly never though about whether its a human or animal vagina. I just don't see a point.
All of my fursonas, despite being female, lack boobs. The dragon doesn't have them because she's reptilian, and I just think reptiles with boobs is weird. The canine is an utter bitch (pun?) and lacks many typically feminine traits (ie wide hips, smaller frame, narrower jawline, etc) including boobs. The feline is generally portrayed as being very child-like both in mentality and overall age, like pre-pubescent young - human children don't have boobs at that age, neither will she.
All of my art adheres to the wookie rule. Genitalia is covered in fur (or feathers, or scales, species depending) so as far as I'm concerned its not really there. There are plenty of other ways to depict male vs female if its that important anyhow. Being as I'm not into the sexual side of the fandom, its really not something I have a preference for in art.
Strictly anatomically speaking, Nataku the dragon has a vent covered in scales and any genitalia she may possess is carried inside the body and not seen. My other two fursonas, one being canine, and one feline, are both covered in fur, and I've honestly never though about whether its a human or animal vagina. I just don't see a point.
All of my fursonas, despite being female, lack boobs. The dragon doesn't have them because she's reptilian, and I just think reptiles with boobs is weird. The canine is an utter bitch (pun?) and lacks many typically feminine traits (ie wide hips, smaller frame, narrower jawline, etc) including boobs. The feline is generally portrayed as being very child-like both in mentality and overall age, like pre-pubescent young - human children don't have boobs at that age, neither will she.
BlueStreak98
Member
Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe
Oh, and just because I feel like I should mention it, I like the inverted look of marsupials. The penis, I'm not particular. But the testicles above the penis just seems... intriguing.
Oh, and just because I feel like I should mention it, I like the inverted look of marsupials. The penis, I'm not particular. But the testicles above the penis just seems... intriguing.
Chernobyl-Hybrid
Member
Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe
for my fursona... since chernobyls underside is a dragon, it would be not showing unless they plan on using it. and it would i suppose be semi-animalistic.. not all to sure since i never thought of what chernobyls genitalia would even look like XD
for my fursona... since chernobyls underside is a dragon, it would be not showing unless they plan on using it. and it would i suppose be semi-animalistic.. not all to sure since i never thought of what chernobyls genitalia would even look like XD
Last edited:
Sithon
Member
Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe
My 'sona has a sheath. I think whether it looks right or not depends on how the anthro character looks, for example if they are more human, animal genitalia would look wrong, but if they are more animalistic (Like my character) human genitals would not look OK. in the case of females, I think only small-no breasts are OK.
My 'sona has a sheath. I think whether it looks right or not depends on how the anthro character looks, for example if they are more human, animal genitalia would look wrong, but if they are more animalistic (Like my character) human genitals would not look OK. in the case of females, I think only small-no breasts are OK.
Judge Spear
Well-Known Member
Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe
I'd never use anything other than what I see on a human...or anything MORE if you know what I mean. BUT if I had a fursona, he wouldn't be in any sexual or flattering scenarios. I reserve that for characters not made to represent me.
I'd never use anything other than what I see on a human...or anything MORE if you know what I mean. BUT if I had a fursona, he wouldn't be in any sexual or flattering scenarios. I reserve that for characters not made to represent me.
Re: (NSFW) A Fursona's Genitalia: Questions on Pysical/ Anatomic gender specific aspe
I prefer to see the genitals matching the species, the more accurate the better.
I have a dislike for genitals that lack accuracy from their species or if they have genitals from the wrong species. It distracts from otherwise good quality good art and stands out as a flaw to me. What irritates me the most is when egg laying species are drawn with external genitalia they don't have.
Before I read this thread, I had thought it was about artists being lazy about drawing genitals properly. Some species have rather difficult/complicated genitals to draw so I figured that artists were not putting the effort into drawing the proper genitals for that reason. Going by this thread, I can now see this is not the case.
That said, the genitals I tend to draw for my chars(when I draw them) are simplistic. Since I have not been drawing sexual scenes or sexual encounters between my chars, there isn't really a need to go into details with their genitals.
If they are in a pose where the genitals would show, I'll draw them.
Most mammals drawn by me get a lump on their belly in the proper place. I think the most detailed genitals I've drawn have been for rodent chars because I was a rat fancier and I know they are "well endowed".
I prefer to see the genitals matching the species, the more accurate the better.
I have a dislike for genitals that lack accuracy from their species or if they have genitals from the wrong species. It distracts from otherwise good quality good art and stands out as a flaw to me. What irritates me the most is when egg laying species are drawn with external genitalia they don't have.
Before I read this thread, I had thought it was about artists being lazy about drawing genitals properly. Some species have rather difficult/complicated genitals to draw so I figured that artists were not putting the effort into drawing the proper genitals for that reason. Going by this thread, I can now see this is not the case.
That said, the genitals I tend to draw for my chars(when I draw them) are simplistic. Since I have not been drawing sexual scenes or sexual encounters between my chars, there isn't really a need to go into details with their genitals.
If they are in a pose where the genitals would show, I'll draw them.
Most mammals drawn by me get a lump on their belly in the proper place. I think the most detailed genitals I've drawn have been for rodent chars because I was a rat fancier and I know they are "well endowed".