@@@ OFFICIAL SUGGESTION THREAD @@@
- Thread starter Dragoneer
- Start date
Thatguywholikesfood
NSFW Writer
Definitely don't purge sorta, ones that have uploaded stuff, etc.
Just the sorta, accounts that are inactive, don't post and only favourite stuff but haven't for years
DiaperedSniper
New Member
We need a way to weed out bad eggs using proxies to further harass people. I came up with a suggestion to tackle it.
Thatguywholikesfood
NSFW Writer
Suggestion on groups:
Like other websites, there should be a proper 'group' feature for people with similar interests, as well as options for if anyone can join or just certain people.
Eg, trusted/verified artists, or just a general group for people who like cute things.
Obviously have there be 'levels' of what people can do in a group, as well as allowing the 'owner' to be replaced if inactive.
Like other websites, there should be a proper 'group' feature for people with similar interests, as well as options for if anyone can join or just certain people.
Eg, trusted/verified artists, or just a general group for people who like cute things.
Obviously have there be 'levels' of what people can do in a group, as well as allowing the 'owner' to be replaced if inactive.
This is something we want to work to improve, it's just not as high a priority as other things right now.
Thatguywholikesfood
NSFW Writer
Ban human child fetish art
I submitted a report on what was clearly human child fetish art and it was denied due to "As there is no visible nudity or sexual content per our Upload Policy, this is permitted. Nudity is defined as the open display of genitalia or exposed female areola or nipples, and does not include bare buttocks. Thank you for your report and for being a part of Fur Affinity!"
I submitted a report on what was clearly human child fetish art and it was denied due to "As there is no visible nudity or sexual content per our Upload Policy, this is permitted. Nudity is defined as the open display of genitalia or exposed female areola or nipples, and does not include bare buttocks. Thank you for your report and for being a part of Fur Affinity!"
Amepix Will Win
Some Furry Artist
Think of the children! Wait... Does that even made sense? Ah, whatever! I agree that fetishizing children is bad. I wish people would stop doing that.
Thatguywholikesfood
NSFW Writer
Quite literally it's human child fetish art - If you're not going to enforce your website rules fairly, why enforce stuff at all?
At least add the filtering system...Or basic 'auto-hider' or something. Like how e621 allows you to blacklist certain artists etc from ever appearing on your feed.
Rap_Daniel
Moving to Furrypile! https://furrypile.co.uk/
What about a version for slower browsers like say a smart TV's web browser? Like Gmail's HTML version?
We recently revised our protocol for these situations so that we can remove more types of content. No policy change, just tighter restrictions when reviewing reports.
Last edited:
Thatguywholikesfood
NSFW Writer
In that case can you re-review my report, please?
You will have to reopen the ticket by commenting on it. And the content has to be sexual or suggestive. It can't just be a kid in diapers - has to be a kid in diapers with hyper scat or something similar, for example. That's a very, very lax example.
Thatguywholikesfood
NSFW Writer
Reopened, quite frankly it's extremely obviously fetish content, it looks like fetish content, it's clearly designed to be fetish content and looking through their gallery, it's blatantly obviously so.
I see it. If you report an entire gallery, we will always ask for all submission links that you think break the rules, which is why this addition wasn't removed before. I'll have the moderator review this as normal. Thanks!
DiaperedSniper
New Member
At least it is on that list. Hopefully it will come soon enough to stop my harassment issues.
Frank Gulotta
Send us your floppy
Deviantart just added a flag system to prevent third party AI datasets from using their users' content to make AI art. Is FA considering implementing something similar?
D
Deleted member 160111
Guest
Come on, they've created their own AI, which you can use for a subscription, right? They just protected themselves so that they wouldn't be pelted with shit. A great plan is to create a huge database, and decades later wait for technological progress and use it. Brilliant. If they hadn't banned the use arts for AI, they would have dug a huge grave.
The idea of a public ban on the use of artificial intelligence is great, but I have absolutely no idea how to implement it. Imho.
Frank Gulotta
Send us your floppy
Yes they did and you can opt out of it; creating your own AI is a sound move in a current situation where AI datasets are going to exist regardless, hence my question. I would love to know if user content on FA is going to benefit from a similar protection as DA has already implemented.
quoting_mungo
Well-Known Member
Not quite; they’re using a fork of Stable Diffusion, already trained on a dataset that includes art scraped from dA. Doesn’t matter if the “no AI” flag is set because the training is already done.
The flag isn’t a BAD idea in itself, but it’s important to realize it’s dependent on the people compiling datasets to voluntarily respect it, unless and until anything else is decided in court. It doesn’t directly prevent inclusion.
It’s not a bad suggestion for FA to look into adding the same flag to submissions here, just need to be realistic about how much of an impact it will have (not much at present). The primary positive aspect is the attempt at introducing a standard for indicating non-consent. The NN training equivalent of robots.txt.
Foxridley
A fox named Ridley
I have a suspicion of who you might be referring to and, if it is them, it seems like there is a fine line they’re stopping just short of.
Real talk: We'd love to, but probably don't have the resources. Nevertheless, I'll bring it up for discussion.
quoting_mungo
Well-Known Member
As I noted here, there’s no evidence the flag actually in itself does anything other than say “please don’t.” Provided dA hasn’t completely bungled the attempt at introducing a standard for such a flag (by, say, failing to provide adequate documentation), my guess would be that it’s relatively straightforward as features go.