
I’m not sure what that means. Some kind of paid verification?No, we'll eventually have a Patreon-style connection.
No, it would auto verify FA+ subscriptions, but could also be used to verify FA membership and reduce spam.I’m not sure what that means. Some kind of paid verification?
I'd say there's undoubtably volunteers who'd willingly spend some time now and again tagging images.with that, possibly a filter for non tagged images,
The difference is, the artist will STILL be able to edit their tags / change them afterwards, if it's mistagged or otherwise.i remember people talking about it before and many artists hated the idea because of the kind of tags on e***
although i guess sense the worst of the tags are banned on fa anyway there is less risk of mistagging them
possibly, also know some users who use a lot of tags run out of space in the tags fieldThe difference is, the artist will STILL be able to edit their tags / change them afterwards, if it's mistagged or otherwise.
Avoids the e621 issue entirely, I'd say.
We wanted to do this but with how many people use FA regularly and the fact it'd have to be moderated, we're not going to. We'll look into other ways of making it intuitive.Allow a sorta 'Tagger' role for some people that aren't mods to let them go through untagged posts and give them tags.
Will the site ever get a "group" feature like they do on DeviantArt? Art the moment, people are just making an account and uploading pictures there via a moderator manually.
NP, so long as you guy are aware of the idea.We've wanted to do this for a bit but it's no priority.
We've thought about this for thing alike friends and managersWould it be possible in the future to give special permissions to another user to help with very minor things like tagging images, writing images descriptions, etc?
Ok, thanks again!We've thought about this for thing alike friends and managersI'd like it, but can't promise anything
I'd say a case of, trusted users etc. As in, you get staff to pick trustworthy FA members and maybe have it be sent as an optional addition to FA users.We wanted to do this but with how many people use FA regularly and the fact it'd have to be moderated, we're not going to. We'll look into other ways of making it intuitive.
Tbh I think that’s for the best. Not a fan of community tagging on galleries. Boorus are a different matter, but even then I’ve seen some tagging behavior that I’m not wild on.We wanted to do this but with how many people use FA regularly and the fact it'd have to be moderated, we're not going to. We'll look into other ways of making it intuitive.
Difference with other systems is that I don't want it to occur for those that actually tag their stuff.Tbh I think that’s for the best. Not a fan of community tagging on galleries. Boorus are a different matter, but even then I’ve seen some tagging behavior that I’m not wild on.
What would be nice if the database has the capability and it’s not going to impact performance/storage too much is a higher character limit for the tags field. While usually not a problem, I actually ran up against the limit with this submission. As you can see, I’ve not used any joke tags or similar, just a lot of species in the picture.