• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

Overused species from your observation

Trpdwarf

Lurking in Castle Moats
oh we got a ranter/expert here guys*gets gear*
ok now I'm ready to go against ya

Lets start with the Eastern Dragon bit...
Do you know of Yinglong...its a Chinese dragon....but oh wait...it has wings cause to them when a dragon reach a certain age it gets wings so there is winged Oriental dragons.

ALSO the amount of fingers varies between the eastern regions sometimes but many notice this.
China-5
Korea-4
Japan-3
Yes I know of the Ranking of Eastern dragons as five toed dragons being god dragons.

Horns, there are also hornless Dragons in the mythos again thanks to the oriental dragons, as western tend to make it almost standard.

The beliefs, Yes I know of those religions that are deep with the dragons, hence why I dont touch their dragons to respect them but off shoot my own that doesnt exist.

Localization-now dont bs me on blaming Americans, luckly I was raised partially by my british god mother who love dragons, thus grew to love them too. As I grew up I began studing other dragons but the Oriental are my new favorite. You can blame Movies and Books made by people who dont know crap about them.

My sonas: 5 years....FIVE FUCKING YEARS, I will admit I was a generic Wolf when I started out, not cause it was cool but cause of how others saw me. I had a pack mentality they said, always looking out for others in that pack, defending them from harm. Over those fucking 5 years I went from generic Wolf to what I am now a sick combination of my Wolf mentality and my love for oriental dragons. My Alt Folseh was also a Sick combination of information of both Western and Oriental thus doesnt follow any mythos since she cannot be associated with either.

I am also sick of generic sonas but then again like my research shows, Over time one begins to research and start developing a true sona for themselves. *takes off gear* you may call me a bitch back too, for I'm the type who also research, but dont join a specific group.

First of all, don't start taking this personally. Don't start Rping here. Also I'm no professional Ranter and this is not ranting. I am simply offering my opinions and knowledge.

I was talking about eastern dragons by default. Not specifically Oriental ones, which are a subsect and you have to be careful because a lot of oriental stuff is wrong because of western influence that changes it for the sake of making money.

Eastern Dragons encomposs more than Japan and China. By default when you look at them they do not have wings because part of the combined mythos is that they don't need them. It is safe to say 97 percent of all eastern dragons are wingless. So a few minor exceptions aside, if you are going for "Eastern Dragon" you go for the wingless look. That is how, it is by default, that is what characterizes it. Also early early early on a few of the ancient dragons were given wings but, that was changed over to being wingless due to the association of them being gods, or demi-gods. In fact there was some speculation that they carried a specific item that helped them in flight.

Actually the finger deals more with symbology(which is where I was going with it) and goes deeper than what you are bringing up. For example: Only the emperor was allowed to wear, own, or use an item with a dragon depicted on it that had 5 fingers because it symbolized the emperor, and emperor dragons/god dragons.

The consorts, and or people directly associated with the Emperor were allowed 4 fingered depictions.

The 3 fingered dragon was allowed for everyone else. If you were caught using the 5 fingered depiction when you are not the Emperor, the punishment would be torture and death. If you were caught using the 4 fingered depiction when you are not associated with the emperor, the punishment could be the same.

Actually I am going to partly blame Americans. Most of what I have seen done of dragons that is complete and utter trash, was done by Americans. That is the problem with trying to collect dragon things in America because most of the makers don't do their research. I mean, they think Wyyvern equals dragon....it's like WTF? I mean the people who sell dragons in America for money, tend to commercialize the hell out of it, so the mythos gets shoved aside for making it "Look cool." That is part of the reason I sort of stopped collecting. There is this explotion of complete crap.

Also many kids have grown up with things such as Dungeons and Dragons, Video-games and so forth....and it has watered down their ability to a great extent to indentify with the original mythos. I am an American...so no one jump on my for calling out on my own people. I am only saying it is what it is. I was part of a Military family at one time and we did a lot of jumping about. The only person I ever came across who knew anything about anything about dragons was archeologist.....who travels the world. So I was left finding every scrap of book I could come across at every bookstore and every library trying to see what dragon was in all the different cultures. It was due to that deep interest that I developed an affinity to a theory behind the dragon(and mythological critters in general), dealing with distribution of fossilized bones, and comparing those creatures to the different dragon archetypes out there. In a Nutshell, the dragon might have been the attempt of humanity to understand dinosaur bones before they understood things go extinct. They would have recreated in their mind what these bones would look like, leading to many mythologies that people either used to, or still believe in.

Back on topic though, it takes a person with either a upbringing that introduces the real mythos around it, or a deep keen interest from the start, to be able to produce or recognize anything half way decent that is of course for the majority. You do have a small minority that have neither but somehow manage to avoid being made stupid about mythology.

About the hornless thing. By default dragons have horns, both east and west. The assocation with the hornless dragon was originally due to a misassociation with Crocodiles as dragons. However early on when crocodiles became a problem, the Chinese declared them not dragons. With that, most known depictions at that time of hornless dragons dropped off to favoring the horned variety. That is because the mindset changed...where if the critter was not horned it was not really a dragon. This ties into how Crocodiles one has protection because they were at one time considered Dragons in a nutshell.

This day in age though if you again, are going to create a dragon, you should stick to certain defaults because it prevents abuse.

I say that because if you want to preserve the meaning of what the mythos is, you have to require people to stick to certain defaults. Otherwise people will take advantage (and they already do) of being able to let a few things go, and it will water down the entire thing, making it generic, and pointless.

If you allow people to sit there and pick out those very few minute instances where defaults are ignored in deep history as an excuse, you can end up with people forcing anything and everything reptiallian to be dragon while paying no attention to mythos at all. (Now this is less about fursonas and more about dragon art in general)

This is why I say, certian things. Such as Eastern Dragons should not or never have wings. Dragons in general should not or never be hornless. That is because I have seen what allowing people to nit-pick at extreme minorities in history has turned the entire thing into.

There are exceptions....and no one has any business acting on them, unless they have OMG skills to pull it off and show they know what they are doing.

For the rest of you thinking this is going to be some great argument, don't expect much, okay? This probably should be taken into the PM's but oh well. Also, no one will win. This is the internet. You don't win here.

To the last bit.....furries tend to start out with generic fursonas. If they take the time they can change that to having something a little less generic. That take patience, creativity and research that not a lot of furs are willing to do.

If that Alt, that I think you linked earlier is what you are referring to as a mix between the two, I'm going to have to be blatently honest. I don't see any themes at all from East or West. I see a lizard with a huge head of hair...that is it. Maybe that just isn't a good example of the charrie.

Anyway, it is true that over time people develope their characters. They do research but that doesn't stop people from sticking with generic and over used because they are too lazy. One last thing, something else that bugs me at least about over used personas is that people use them as an excuse to act a way online that they are not in real life.

Example: Person has low self esteem, bad social issues and so forth. Becomes a furrie and uses a dragon as the fursona to make himself or herself feel strong, and special, and powerful, and then bully others, or get arrogent or prideful because "I'm a dragon, rawr, don't mess with me." I've actually come across a pathetic dragon "otherkin" group that are all social rejects that use the dragon to try to make themselves seem bigger and more important than they really are.

The way I look at it, it's pathetic. Hiding behind something to give yourself certain social attributes that you do not really have, is foolish, and silly. If you are not social and protective of your friends, don't call yourself a wolf. Then again, not all people think that far when decided what their persona will be. That's just a difference in opinions. I think if people spent more time choosing what reflects them and less time choosing what is cool to them, we would have less fo an issue with overused fursonas.
 

Trpdwarf

Lurking in Castle Moats
Totally respect what you said and all but, uh... don't point fingers.

I'm not saying all Americans are like that. It is just that, when it comes to finding good stuff, I really do have to look for non-American stuff. The worst crap I have found is American made.

Part of it I think is that Americans are taught in school to only value American history and the American view of things....that leads to the inability to appreciate culture in other countries. That further leads to an inability to respect things associated with different cultures such as different religions, or mythos. This is at least how it was in every school I went to, and I went to many since before my parents divorced I was part of a military family.

The last school I was in, was the absolute worst. This is history: American History, Slavery, Wars we won. That is it. It's sickening.

Back on topic, I have met kids everywhere, and teens, and adults, who think that they can change anything to suit their fancy. Religion? History? Art? Art History? The way things really happened? Mythology? Culture? It's all things they think they can change when one aspect does't suit their fancy. It is why we are the way we are, for many of us. We are so stuck up and full of ourselves...and it is a wonder why some people don't like us.
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

Inglorious Bastard
Wolves, Foxes, Dragons, and Huskies.

I Hybridized mine because of my Personlaity/features fits with both.

I am also sometimes urked when a person picks a Fursona because it is "Cool". I have a friend who is a Fox furry...for his Peronality and things, he's more of a Ferret than a Fox. His friends had picked it for him..
 
The most overused species are foxes, wolves, tigers, dragons and hybrids (for those who cannot make up their minds).

I think that people don't put a lot of effort into vetting their symbolic species. People often pick foxes and wolves, for instance, to be their fursona because a lot of people are that and they feel that they can get into the in-crowd if they declare themselves as one of the popular species.

People ought to read up on the species they're interested in to see if they're truly akin to that species' characteristics and mannerisms.

Well said, and cute avatar, and Zeke that is quite sad -_- I'd prefer to see a fursona that one chose for themselves rather than one chosen for them or because it was 'cool' Perhaps they will grow to see how they are? Or maybe they'll change and permanently join the legions of foxes running around on here XP

Although i do also agree that most likely the reason there are an over abundance of certain types of furs *coughs* - it would be really redundant to relist that again as i've just read this whole thread and am almost REALLY tired of reading that same litany over and over again) but that there are people who might choose a popular type in the hopes that that will make THEM popular instantly - i mean - if everyone's a fox, then if you are one too you win right? And maybe after a while as they slowly realize that might not be perfectly reflecting what they are, or they grow tired of being one among the many (as a cosplayer, may i mention Naruto cosplayers as a perfect example?) And branch off to more unique things.

Unfortunately i shall not be branching off to more unique things but *shrugs* I've accepted that i'll be inevitably confused with the people who just want a cute popular fursona lol XP (i have a few times so... I don't mind it since i know who i am at least somewhat now) Anyone else ever have that problem? On the topic? Like being one of the top used groups here, do people ever assume that you just chose your animal on a whim? (that, probably should be anouther topic entirely, but it dovetails into this particular conversation so i don't want to break off into a new thread entirely for it)
 

Trpdwarf

Lurking in Castle Moats
Well said, and cute avatar, and Zeke that is quite sad -_- I'd prefer to see a fursona that one chose for themselves rather than one chosen for them or because it was 'cool' Perhaps they will grow to see how they are? Or maybe they'll change and permanently join the legions of foxes running around on here XP

Although i do also agree that most likely the reason there are an over abundance of certain types of furs *coughs* - it would be really redundant to relist that again as i've just read this whole thread and am almost REALLY tired of reading that same litany over and over again) but that there are people who might choose a popular type in the hopes that that will make THEM popular instantly - i mean - if everyone's a fox, then if you are one too you win right? And maybe after a while as they slowly realize that might not be perfectly reflecting what they are, or they grow tired of being one among the many (as a cosplayer, may i mention Naruto cosplayers as a perfect example?) And branch off to more unique things.

Unfortunately i shall not be branching off to more unique things but *shrugs* I've accepted that i'll be inevitably confused with the people who just want a cute popular fursona lol XP (i have a few times so... I don't mind it since i know who i am at least somewhat now) Anyone else ever have that problem? On the topic? Like being one of the top used groups here, do people ever assume that you just chose your animal on a whim? (that, probably should be anouther topic entirely, but it dovetails into this particular conversation so i don't want to break off into a new thread entirely for it)

I agree entirely that it is better for people to choose their own fursona. Who knows you better than yourself? My first furrie friends tried to tell me I should be a fox. It took the best of 8 years to find something to settle down with the be more myself, which is what you see in my info, Maned Wolf.

I never thought of it that way though, that people might choose something thinking it will make them insta-popular. It makes sense though.
 

Milo Foxbrush

New Member
I've seen so many different species, but none I would say are overused. Sure I've seen many of the same species, but each one I've seen has still been unique in its own way. Through my observations, it doesn't matter to me how many foxes, wolves, dragons, etc there are. It's all down to how the individual portrays themselves as their chosen species.

Anyway, I chose a fox because I've always been connected to them in one way or another. But I also like to portray myself as a skunk and sometimes a raccoon. But considering that foxes were the first animal I ever clicked with, I chose that as my 'default' to portray.
 

Verin Asper

The Smart Idiot
Im just gonna say this for the one who is the dragon expert (and no its not an insult but a compliment) Again I read up on dragons and take bits and peices, never whole. I do not conform to the rules due to they are not set in stone, as they are revised and changed.

and your idea on over used sonas....sadly it isnt gonna go away there will always be an over used species just less than previous times.

and the american thing, yes cause were learning our history, if you go to other places they probably learning theirs too. and No my God Mother is currently a Kin not an otherkin

Added: also to apologize for the issue, I have a thing against those who I deem are elitist, the instant I find one I end up engaging against them to gauge them on their knowledge. Just shows I do need to update my reading and my book collections on dragons and other species if I wish to continue my 4 years of research on furries in general.
 
Last edited:

Trpdwarf

Lurking in Castle Moats
Im just gonna say this for the one who is the dragon expert (and no its not an insult but a compliment) Again I read up on dragons and take bits and peices, never whole. I do not conform to the rules due to they are not set in stone, as they are revised and changed.

and your idea on over used sonas....sadly it isnt gonna go away there will always be an over used species just less than previous times.

and the american thing, yes cause were learning our history, if you go to other places they probably learning theirs too. and No my God Mother is currently a Kin not an otherkin

Added: also to apologize for the issue, I have a thing against those who I deem are elitist, the instant I find one I end up engaging against them to gauge them on their knowledge. Just shows I do need to update my reading and my book collections on dragons and other species if I wish to continue my 4 years of research on furries in general.

I'm not a dragon expert if that is what you are slightly implying. I just happen to know a lot. That said....in the places I have been to, the focus is only history only....which is okay. When it gets to history of other places? You have to go to College for that.

As someone who loves history and appreciates it, I really think we do kids and teens a disservice by focusing on us all the time in the History classes.

No apology needed. I should apologize for being a slight bit aggressive. It's the way I am, and I've worked really hard to tone back things when I talk about the subject. I still cannot prevent myself from writing a Tl;dr...and I am working on that too.

I understand questioning people who seem elitist. I do that myself from time to time. I would suggest looking beyond books covering just dragons. Find bestiaries. A good one is by Carol Rose, and it is called "Giants, Monsters & Dragons." Taking a look at other critters that resemble dragons, that is a good way to start differentiating what things are. The broader your basis of knowledge on the different critters, the better off you are.


Also look for, "The Element Encyclopaedia of Magical Creatures" by John & Caitlin Matthews. The cover of this thick heavy book is deceiving because it makes it look childish but the information inside is pretty consistent for a Bestiary.

As for books on dragons these two catch my eyes and being rather nice.
A really charming book to find, is called "Year of the Dragon, Legends and lore". It is put out by Barnes and Nobles and arranged by Pavilion Books Unlimited.

If you don't already own this one, look for "The Book of the Dragon" by Ciruelo. The information in there is quite good as per stories, and the illustrations...this person knows what he is doing. It's beautiful...to get the full color copy of this is a gem.
 
Last edited:

Verin Asper

The Smart Idiot
I'm not a dragon expert if that is what you are slightly implying. I just happen to know a lot. That said....in the places I have been to, the focus is only history only....which is okay. When it gets to history of other places? You have to go to College for that.

As someone who loves history and appreciates it, I really think we do kids and teens a disservice by focusing on us all the time in the History classes.

No apology needed. I should apologize for being a slight bit aggressive. It's the way I am, and I've worked really hard to tone back things when I talk about the subject. I still cannot prevent myself from writing a Tl;dr...and I am working on that too.

I understand questioning people who seem elitist. I do that myself from time to time. I would suggest looking beyond books covering just dragons. Find bestiaries. A good one is by Carol Rose, and it is called "Giants, Monsters & Dragons." Taking a look at other critters that resemble dragons, that is a good way to start differentiating what things are. The broader your basis of knowledge on the different critters, the better off you are.


Also look for, "The Element Encyclopaedia of Magical Creatures" by John & Caitlin Matthews. The cover of this thick heavy book is deceiving because it makes it look childish but the information inside is pretty consistent for a Bestiary.

As for books on dragons these two catch my eyes and being rather nice.
A really charming book to find, is called "Year of the Dragon, Legends and lore". It is put out by Barnes and Nobles and arranged by Pavilion Books Unlimited.

If you don't already own this one, look for "The Book of the Dragon" by Ciruelo. The information in there is quite good as per stories, and the illustrations...this person knows what he is doing. It's beautiful...to get the full color copy of this is a gem.

thanks I'll look out for those after I get paid next friday, hopefully I'll have money left over from arts I requested and late christmas Gifts to get at least some of these to assist in my research.

Since I was 15 I started this as a side hobby, crossing various furs and recording what they were, to only cross them again as something else that they believed fitted to their personality more. I have yet to find a place I can sit down and begin recording yet but my life as a net nomad will eventually find me a good active spot.
 

GoreKitten

Banned
Banned
Wolves, Foxes, Dragons, and Huskies.

I Hybridized mine because of my Personlaity/features fits with both.

I am also sometimes urked when a person picks a Fursona because it is "Cool". I have a friend who is a Fox furry...for his Peronality and things, he's more of a Ferret than a Fox. His friends had picked it for him..

I'm with you there! the only reason I'm a hybrid is because my spirit animal is a hybrid and well... that's a long story...
 

Darkwing

Member
wolves,

I am a wolf because they match my own personality.

The arctic part is to keep it unique, and because I love winter =)
 

Records

Records Raccoon
Not looking for a fight- but wolves are really over used to me. the same could be said for dogs but I notice alot more wolves running around.

I'm in this boat too- but i'm noticing alot more cross species like Fox Wolfs and Dog Foxes and the likes.
 

Silva-Dragon

Metal to the Core
I see way to many Canine,Tentacle beast,Dragon,raccon,hummingbird,Ferret,Ktulu hybrids.

They're becoming a problem, and need to be dealt with...
Le boom time

Number 23, calling number 23.
*BOOM*
Number 24, calling number 24....
 

Riptor

Ran Out Of User Titles
What everyone else said, wolves and foxes.

Frankly, I wonder if I'm doing this whole fursona thing right. I don't have a spirit animal, and I can't really think of any animal that matches my personality. I picked a raptor because I wanted something new and creative, and because I like dinosaurs a lot.
 

FelixAlexander

Friendly neighbourhood Furry
Frankly, I wonder if I'm doing this whole fursona thing right. I don't have a spirit animal, and I can't really think of any animal that matches my personality. I picked a raptor because I wanted something new and creative, and because I like dinosaurs a lot.
I mostly picked my red fox fursona just because I like foxes :p I don't know much about spirit animals, and I don't think that's really a requirement. I may not be all that well versed in the Furry Fandom yet, but I believe choosing your Fursona is mostly about creating a character you can identify with and who you can use to represent yourself, I don't think you actually need to have a spiritual bound with the animal species you choose (though a lot of people do).

On-topic, definitely wolves and foxes. Especially red foxes. Meh. Still proud to be one :p
 
Last edited:

EmoWolf

Off hunting...
At least I'm an Arctic Wolf...
That's a little different, isn't it?
But yeah, you can never have too many wolves :)
 

Darkwing

Member
At least I'm an Arctic Wolf...
That's a little different, isn't it?

No, sadly it is not.
I have seen plenty of Arctic Wolves on this forum.

Let alone I am one myself = /
 

Wild_Wolf

New Member
i would say wolfs or dogs are the most overused but i think that most people relate to them alot more than any other species. i mean when most people grow up as a child they often have a dog so they can relate to them more.
 

Silva-Dragon

Metal to the Core
in all serious, My fursona changes as I change, Its an extension of what I fell be me.
Used to live where it was fuckin nipply, hence arctic fox.
no such thing as over used, as every fursona is different, just often enough the same species.

I could also say this in a related sence (sort of...)

There are too many white people, they're becoming a problem, ya, same with all the black people, oh, and also the natives, hindu, bhudist, Japanese,Vietnamese,chinese,russian and so on.

only solution I see, Wipe em all out, Nuke style, then there not overused
 

haynari

Member
I was wondering what my ideal fursona would be so I took like 10 quizzes and all agreed that I should be a red fox. plus I am adorable :3
 

DJ-Fragon

Active Member
Wolves, foxes, dragons, and gryphons. Since they're quite overused, I tried making something at least a bit original with my fursona. I guess you don't see fire wings very often (Unless you're a phoenix).
 
As other have said, wolves, fox, dragon, dog, cat, etc.
Though a question about dogs...
Do you consider different breeds to be different 'species', so to speak, when it comes to fursonas? As in would you consider a person who had, say, a Japanese Chin for a fursona to be in the same category as someone who uses a German Shepherd?
My fursona used to be a Pekingese, and I definitely wouldn't put my Peke fursona in the same class as someone's Siberian husky fursie. xD

Though yeah, I think a lot of the 'overuse' of certain species is not only because said species are cute, cuddly, and cool, but also because some species simply translate into anthro/furry form better than others.
I for one tried really hard to design an anglerfish fursona, but everything I drew wound up looking like something that swam out of the Uncanny Valley rather than an anthropomorphisized fish. So I settled with a wolpertinger as my fursona. (For those who don't know, wolpertingers are a fictional species similar to jackalopes, invented as a prank to play on tourists vistiting the Gemran alps. Yeah, basically they'd just take taxedermied rabbits or squirrels and tack on fangs, wings, bird feet, and what have you.)
 
Top