• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

Question about genitalia (18+ i guess)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fuzzykicks

New Member
I'm very confused when people hate on furry who draws animal genitalia and calling them zoophiles though the mentioned artists only draws anthro not even ferals. Is there really a problem in a furry community with people who draw animal genitalia on their oc? I mean even a simple dog penis is very popular in nsfw furry designs and it's not even implies that people who draw it looked up real dog cocks, since art community itself contains a lot of this content (drawings).
I need to mention, I'm very much new in this stuff. I've loved anthro characters all my live but I never was a part of an actual furry community and didnt draw nsfw until like 2020.
So basically I'm asking will I be in trouble if I decide to draw to my oc genitalia of an animal they represent?
 

Stray Cat Terry

테리 / 特里 / テリー
What matters? As an artist, you draw what you want to!

You don't need to care about others' thoughts as long as it's not some sort of business! (Haters gonna hate, and they always try to get the best excuses to accuse you! Ignore them)
(Oh and forgot to tell also: Don't bring it to someone who ain't willing to see em!)
And if it is, ask the commissioners how they'd like the art to be, it's up to them so just let them make the decisions. When anything goes wrong via 3rd party viewers, you ain't the one to 'blame' for--you just did what the commissioners asked!

Or, regardless of this, if you're neutral between the two types, and if I were you then, I'd choose to draw the one that has less potential troubles than the other UwU

Happy drawing! >w<
 
Last edited:

TyraWadman

The Brutally Honest Man-Child
I was just as confused when I discovered furries. They like Balto and Lion king, but as soon as they see another walking/talking 4-legged wolf OC, that somehow meant they were into zoo (even if there wasn't any NSFW stuff involved). So then a lot of them went to two-legged, upright anthros with wangs reminiscent to their respective species. That wasn't good enough either, so now I guess people want cream-colored human weenies that (for whatever reason) match their own fur-color, making me think the fur doesn't stop where it should be smooth!

As long as you aren't using assets from real photos (photoshopping/photomanipulations of real human/animal genitals) and it's 100% hand-drawn, then you're fine. You can make alien weenies or human weenies if you want.
 

Jaredthefox92

Banned
Banned
Here we go again, I'll say this. Not everyone is just "okay" with this. Just as most people offline don't want to see porn art, (at least not in the open), many people such as myself find this utterly revolting and disgusting. You'll have to either live with that, or don't bring it up. Also, I'll state that there's people on this forum who are not adults so you probably shouldn't continue this sexual based thread.
 

vickers

Active Member
Honestly at this point I'm pretty sure everyone who draws a dog penis is just referencing another drawing of a dog penis. I've seen the real thing on a wikipedia page and it is very unpleasant looking, I think most furries try to make it look nicer for the art's sake xD

But people will always disagree on things, I always go by the golden rule "don't like, don't look." If they don't wanna see it, they should just close the tab it and ignore it!
 

Jaredthefox92

Banned
Banned
Honestly at this point I'm pretty sure everyone who draws a dog penis is just referencing another drawing of a dog penis. I've seen the real thing on a wikipedia page and it is very unpleasant looking, I think most furries try to make it look nicer for the art's sake xD

But people will always disagree on things, I always go by the golden rule "don't like, don't look." If they don't wanna see it, they should just close the tab it and ignore it!

Can we please stop with this thread? THERE ARE KIDS ON THIS FORUM.
 

vickers

Active Member

Jaredthefox92

Banned
Banned

LameFox

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't say you'd be 'in trouble'. It's just that when you're sexualizing something that has characteristics of non-sapient animals, everyone draws the line somewhere different. Some don't like the idea of sexual furries at all, some will be okay with certain animal parts (or art styles) but not others, some don't mind as long as they're bipedal, some will look to established canon to decide if a 'feral' is sapient or not, some will look at context, etc.
 

Yakamaru

Spookdogg
>New account
>Starts talking about adult and/or controversial stuff almost immediately

Guys, are you incapable of recognizing patterns?
 

Jaredthefox92

Banned
Banned
>New account
>Starts talking about adult and/or controversial stuff almost immediately

Guys, are you incapable of recognizing patterns?

I know, it looks like a troll move. I just am giving them the benefit of the doubt, some people are that naïve.
 

LameFox

Well-Known Member
I mean if it takes a couple seconds to answer the question how much effort is it really worth to figure out if they're trolling or not. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 

LameFox

Well-Known Member
A question that shouldn't be on this forum in the first place. This isn't F-list.
Interpreting whether it's 'vague' enough to be allowed here per the rules is something I'll leave to the staff, since it doesn't really matter what we think anyway.
 

Jaredthefox92

Banned
Banned
Interpreting whether it's 'vague' enough to be allowed here per the rules is something I'll leave to the staff, since it doesn't really matter what we think anyway.

True, one reason I never want to be a moderator in anything other than my own discord group. Too many grey areas and also too many people who try to get through the proverbial cracks, so to speak.
 

Stray Cat Terry

테리 / 特里 / テリー
>New account
>Starts talking about adult and/or controversial stuff almost immediately

Guys, are you incapable of recognizing patterns?
"Repeating same procedure over and over hoping for difference is nothing more than insanity."

I think someone said this kinda quote and it's famous.
That being said--Yup! Guess I'm insane! >p<

And one tiny but important thing for me is that I don't wanna miss on that one or two people potentially and actually in need... That's me though :d
 

Yakamaru

Spookdogg
"Repeating same procedure over and over hoping for difference is nothing more than insanity."

I think someone said this kinda quote and it's famous.
That being said--Yup! Guess I'm insane! >p<

And one tiny but important thing for me is that I don't wanna miss on that one or two people potentially and actually in need... That's me though :d
Aye.

"The definition of insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again expecting different results".

This is pretty much my reaction:
image1-4.png

"Eeyy, entertainment!"
 

Fuzzykicks

New Member
"Repeating same procedure over and over hoping for difference is nothing more than insanity."

I think someone said this kinda quote and it's famous.
That being said--Yup! Guess I'm insane! >p<

And one tiny but important thing for me is that I don't wanna miss on that one or two people potentially and actually in need... That's me though :d
I don't know why people are so fast on point that I'm a troll, but I'm really not an one and it was a geniune question. Anyway, thanks a lot for answering me on this one, I think I'm more or less got that people thinks about this all even with this small thread.
Also I've checked that adult topics aren't entirely prohibited on this forums and I've seen other 18+ threads and pointed that this thread will be 18+ aswell. Though I think that this site could use some nsfw marks and toggles.
so... uh.... can I somehow close this thread?
 
Last edited:

Kumali

Lupine-American
Before this thread gets locked, I'll just comment that from where I stand the depiction of genitalia is not necessarily sexualization, and if people are going to get freaked out by the mere admission that genitalia exist, I would advise you to avert your eyes from Michelangelo's David (just to name one example).

 
Last edited:

Jaredthefox92

Banned
Banned
Before this thread gets locked, I'll just comment that from where I stand the depiction of genitalia is not necessarily sexualization, and if people are going to get freaked out by the mere admission that genitalia exist, I would advise you to avert your eyes from Michaelangelo's David (just to name one example).


Except, that doesn't fly when it's Fur Affinity and almost all depictions are lewd in nature.
 

Kumali

Lupine-American
Except, that doesn't fly when it's Fur Affinity and almost all depictions are lewd in nature.
Again: the depiction of genitalia, in and of itself, is not necessarily sexualization. If the image is lewd in nature, then it's lewd in nature. But that doesn't make all depiction of genitalia "porn art" - not even on FA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top