• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

Signs that the artist also draws porn

Dedskunk

Member
Would a supposed clean non furry artist draw something like this?
ce3f9132becea3d6490ff6785b3ab9b0a96bead7a412ca1f88571dac3b7387c7.jpg


Who are they trying to fool?
 

Yakamaru

Your average Stand enjoyer
Some artists keep their NSFW and SFW "names" separate.

As for NSFW: I've seen a loooooooot of porn over the years. Gotten a knack to see whether or not an artist draws porn. And I am right 99% of the time with artists I've not seen before, so this theory of mine seems to be getting good results so far. :p
 

Sarcastic Coffeecup

Hand. Cannot. Erase.
Oh gee someone draws sexually suggestive content. I wonder if this person draws sexual content.
Doesn't really take that much to add 1 to 1.
 

Yakamaru

Your average Stand enjoyer
Oh gee someone draws sexually suggestive content. I wonder if this person draws sexual content.
Doesn't really take that much to add 1 to 1.
Artists such as for instance MacMegaGERC draws suggestive art but no actual porn.
 

Dedskunk

Member
Artists such as for instance MacMegaGERC draws suggestive art but no actual porn.
Yeah if an artist tells you that their disgusted by porn and won't draw it it means they probably secretly draw or have drawn porn before. Rick Griffin is a perfect example of this.
 

Yakamaru

Your average Stand enjoyer
Yeah if an artist tells you that their disgusted by porn and won't draw it it means they probably secretly draw or have drawn porn before. Rick Griffin is a perfect example of this.
they're*
 

nerdbat

Green butt of reason
subjective
But isn't morality a social-related subject that's heavily linked with common knowledge? It can be relative (i.e. "it can be acceptable in Russia, but here in Australia, it's immoral to do"), but I honestly don't see how something can be more/less "immoral" depending on singleperson or opinion. Maybe I'm missing something, though
 
Last edited:

nerdbat

Green butt of reason
indeed you are. morals differ in different countries because they are established based on opinion and not concrete fact. its established on what people /think/ is 'right'.
when something is based on opinion and not concrete fact, its subjective
Not exactly - they're usually based on ethical differences, historical events, various practical social purposes, etc. For one of many examples, it's unethical and immoral (and to some degree even illegal) to call black person by certain N-word in US due to its historical context, it's perfectly fine to do that in Russia, since we never had any history of black slavery here. In other words, there's a reason for it to be immoral for one nation, and no reason for it to be immoral for the other nation, and that's where differences in morality come from. Moral standards don't appear without a reason, good or bad, and they always have some kind of basis behind them, therefore it's fair to call them objective, rather than subjective.
 
Last edited:

Dedskunk

Member
Is it a really a big deal if an artist draws porn? What if they draw both NSFW and SFW art posts it on their social page?
I'm just saying artists like Rick Griffin how make really suggestive SFW art and you would think he'd have porn somewhere. I like to think that he has porn on a USB drive and he's just waiting to unleash it onto every furry porn sit and make the fandom explode.
 

srcs

New Member
I'm just saying artists like Rick Griffin how make really suggestive SFW art and you would think he'd have porn somewhere. I like to think that he has porn on a USB drive and he's just waiting to unleash it onto every furry porn sit and make the fandom explode.
Ok. So what if he does? Do you have a point?
 
S

Sergei Sóhomo

Guest
Some artists keep their NSFW and SFW "names" separate.

As for NSFW: I've seen a loooooooot of porn over the years. Gotten a knack to see whether or not an artist draws porn. And I am right 99% of the time with artists I've not seen before, so this theory of mine seems to be getting good results so far. :p

A majority of the time you can easily tell by how they draw their characters. Take for example Wolfy-Nail and his homage to someone's loss.

so this thread is about your weird creepy fetish for this artist?

Wouldn't doubt it my amigo~
 
S

Sergei Sóhomo

Guest
no....
what you're describing is more of a custom. it's objective what is and isn't a custom in a country because they are concretely decided whether someone does or doesn't agree with it.
morals are a matter of right and wrong period. you can't prove right and wrong concretely because it's arguable no matter how many people agree with one side or the other on a massive scale


the bigger question is did you honestly take that seriously? i was joking. inb4 'jokes aren't so easy to tell on the internet because it's text'


ok. you think porn isn't immoral but some wholesome religious person may in fact find it immoral. neither one of you is wrong or right because you can't prove the morality of porn with fact. and if you do think you are the the more 'right' person, then again, prove it. with fact.
your little copout method of rephrasing my post to turn it around on me is pathetic and is doing no good for your argument btw

I ain't finna go through the thread. What's all dis shit aboot
 
S

Sergei Sóhomo

Guest
i ain't 'finna' spoon feed you info that's already in front of you. go through the thread c:
pffft like there's actually much to even go through. we're only on page 2 so far

Yeah but it's not juicy enough to enjoy it. Maybe Ferzu has just tainted me to expect quality
 
Top