Yakamaru
Woof? Woof
Some artists keep their NSFW and SFW "names" separate.
As for NSFW: I've seen a loooooooot of porn over the years. Gotten a knack to see whether or not an artist draws porn. And I am right 99% of the time with artists I've not seen before, so this theory of mine seems to be getting good results so far.
As for NSFW: I've seen a loooooooot of porn over the years. Gotten a knack to see whether or not an artist draws porn. And I am right 99% of the time with artists I've not seen before, so this theory of mine seems to be getting good results so far.
Sarcastic Coffeecup
Hand. Cannot. Erase.
Oh gee someone draws sexually suggestive content. I wonder if this person draws sexual content.
Doesn't really take that much to add 1 to 1.
Doesn't really take that much to add 1 to 1.
Yakamaru
Woof? Woof
Artists such as for instance MacMegaGERC draws suggestive art but no actual porn.
Yeah if an artist tells you that their disgusted by porn and won't draw it it means they probably secretly draw or have drawn porn before. Rick Griffin is a perfect example of this.
Yakamaru
Woof? Woof
they're*
Why? Porn isn't illegal or immoral.
Nope.
nerdbat
Green butt of reason
But isn't morality a social-related subject that's heavily linked with common knowledge? It can be relative (i.e. "it can be acceptable in Russia, but here in Australia, it's immoral to do"), but I honestly don't see how something can be more/less "immoral" depending on singleperson or opinion. Maybe I'm missing something, though
Last edited:
nerdbat
Green butt of reason
Not exactly - they're usually based on ethical differences, historical events, various practical social purposes, etc. For one of many examples, it's unethical and immoral (and to some degree even illegal) to call black person by certain N-word in US due to its historical context, it's perfectly fine to do that in Russia, since we never had any history of black slavery here. In other words, there's a reason for it to be immoral for one nation, and no reason for it to be immoral for the other nation, and that's where differences in morality come from. Moral standards don't appear without a reason, good or bad, and they always have some kind of basis behind them, therefore it's fair to call them objective, rather than subjective.
Last edited:
Really? Fucking really? Is everything drama to you people?
I'm just saying artists like Rick Griffin how make really suggestive SFW art and you would think he'd have porn somewhere. I like to think that he has porn on a USB drive and he's just waiting to unleash it onto every furry porn sit and make the fandom explode.
Wither
Is honestly confused by life.
so this thread is about your weird creepy fetish for this artist?
Prove that it is subjective.
Ok. So what if he does? Do you have a point?
TomVaporeon
actually it's tanja now
You can't do that. The burden of proof lies on you, having made the positive claim. You're the one that has to prove it.
S
Sergei Sóhomo
Guest
Some artists keep their NSFW and SFW "names" separate.
As for NSFW: I've seen a loooooooot of porn over the years. Gotten a knack to see whether or not an artist draws porn. And I am right 99% of the time with artists I've not seen before, so this theory of mine seems to be getting good results so far.
A majority of the time you can easily tell by how they draw their characters. Take for example Wolfy-Nail and his homage to someone's loss.
Wouldn't doubt it my amigo~
S
Sergei Sóhomo
Guest
I ain't finna go through the thread. What's all dis shit aboot
S
Sergei Sóhomo
Guest
Yeah but it's not juicy enough to enjoy it. Maybe Ferzu has just tainted me to expect quality
Its nothing personal really. And you don't what to know about my fetish.
S
Sergei Sóhomo
Guest
We're sure we wouldn't
Like I said his art looks to good that there's no way he hasn't (or had at one time) drawn porn