There's an FA user I watch (not naming names!) who occasionally Livestreams art. Sometimes we get a glimpse of the artist's FA page, and I always cringe when I see how many notifications are indicated at the top of the page. At one point, I even begged, begged the person: clean out some of them! "That can't be good for the database," I said once, at least several months ago - not knowing just how right I would apparently be!
It's been a while, but if I remember right, there were over 500,000 - and that's just the submissions, not the journals (also a huge number), watches (over 1000), or unread notes (also over 1000 - shame, shame!).
(Or maybe 50,000 submissions; I'm only 80% sure I remembered the number of digits right, but it's still up there!)
...
That's who I blame for this outage now.
(No, not really!)
(Well... maybe a little bit. But I respect this artist enough to forgive a bit of sloppiness, and if any of you know who I'm talking about, I ask you to do the same. Remember, with better site coding, this wouldn't have been an issue in the first place!)
...
As for FA's new pruning limit, I fully approve of the concept. I think the limit itself should probably be more lenient, though. Instead of 90 days, how about 1 year? That'll still purge tons of junk, but be much less likely to be noticed by the people who'd be annoyed by it! (It could even be a gradual limit to get us used to the idea; make the limit 3 years for two months, 2 years for six more months, and then 1 year.)