KaputOtter
New Member
Hi. 
While you guys are revising the filter system, I'd like to suggest that you overhaul the species lists as well. It's been frustrating for some of us to upload because we can't categorize our work as well as we'd like, and that makes it harder to search for things, too.
I reccomend against having a list of species that is too specific, for example: fox, wolf, skunk, cat, etc.
Instead, I reccomend something like this:
------------------
Mammals
--------
canine/lupine/vulpine (these tags can be consolidated or seperated, I can't decide which would be better...)
feline
mustelid
mephit
mongoose
raccoon
hyena
viverrid
bear
This will enable users to effectively categorize *ANY* picture of *ANY* kind of mammal. I believe the only mammallian class that's missing is Euplerida, which includes Malagasy fossas and mongooses. Personally I'd love to see that thrown in there because I'm fossa-biased, but, you know, it probably won't be that commonly used except by me and a few other fossa enthusiasts. ;D
It will *ALSO* help inspire people to draw pictures of OTHER KINDS OF ANIMALS FOR ONCE, since they'll see what else is available to them. Wink wink nudge nudge. YAAAAAAAY different animals.
Anywho, the list continues! :
Other
------
reptile
bird
human
fish
amphibian
fantasy -- dragons
fantasy -- miscellaneous
insect
invertebrate
non-animal
Seeing as how dragons are so very popular, it follows that they should probably have a tag all their own, and anything else can be lumped into miscellaneous.
Non-animal obviously encompasses all imagery that does not have a human or animal subject at all. But this is specific to imagery, not writing/music.
What do you all think?
While you guys are revising the filter system, I'd like to suggest that you overhaul the species lists as well. It's been frustrating for some of us to upload because we can't categorize our work as well as we'd like, and that makes it harder to search for things, too.
I reccomend against having a list of species that is too specific, for example: fox, wolf, skunk, cat, etc.
Instead, I reccomend something like this:
------------------
Mammals
--------
canine/lupine/vulpine (these tags can be consolidated or seperated, I can't decide which would be better...)
feline
mustelid
mephit
mongoose
raccoon
hyena
viverrid
bear
This will enable users to effectively categorize *ANY* picture of *ANY* kind of mammal. I believe the only mammallian class that's missing is Euplerida, which includes Malagasy fossas and mongooses. Personally I'd love to see that thrown in there because I'm fossa-biased, but, you know, it probably won't be that commonly used except by me and a few other fossa enthusiasts. ;D
It will *ALSO* help inspire people to draw pictures of OTHER KINDS OF ANIMALS FOR ONCE, since they'll see what else is available to them. Wink wink nudge nudge. YAAAAAAAY different animals.
Anywho, the list continues! :
Other
------
reptile
bird
human
fish
amphibian
fantasy -- dragons
fantasy -- miscellaneous
insect
invertebrate
non-animal
Seeing as how dragons are so very popular, it follows that they should probably have a tag all their own, and anything else can be lumped into miscellaneous.
Non-animal obviously encompasses all imagery that does not have a human or animal subject at all. But this is specific to imagery, not writing/music.
What do you all think?