Did I mention you have to be connected to the internet to play SINGLE PLAYER?
Yeah I'm pretty fucking pissed off about it. At least they're letting us switch to US servers in about two months.Do you enjoy being region locked and not able to play online without going through that shit that is Battle.net? I also heard it has an irritating form of DRM that is reminiscent to a rootkit.
Sure you can play single player while offline, but you can't get any achievements offline.No you don't. You need to activate your game's key code online and log in with your Battle.net account once. Activating a keycode has been the primary form of DRM for over a decade, and only now, because of a single required log in, people are flipping out about it.
Hell, I unplugged my network cable and started the game. It worked.
Sure you can play single player while offline, but you can't get any achievements offline.
Sure you can play single player while offline, but you can't get any achievements offline.
How soul-crushingly disappointing.
Now at 50%....from 37% in like 15 minutes :V
60% from 50% in 8 minutes...
Slow game installation is slow![]()
Yeah get used to it. The loading screens are pretty slow too.
Sure you can play single player while offline, but you can't get any achievements offline.
I swear to god the insane AI uses hax
what a dick
I tried a 1v1 against an insane AI with my 3 friends spectating. Fucker had a Colossus in 4 minutes, easy. My one friend was keeping an eye on the APM counter; it broke an average of 400.
You mean 1/3 of Starcraft II. Enjoy buying each campaign as full games. I might think about picking it up someday when it's like $19.99 or something. But not $60.
You mean 1/3 of Starcraft II. Enjoy buying each campaign as full games. I might think about picking it up someday when it's like $19.99 or something. But not $60.
Except the Terran campaign alone is about as long as the entirety of the original Starcraft. And I hope you don't think that most people are going to buy Starcraft II for the campaign. When the other installations come out, the changes to multiplayer are what people will want. Plus there's the fact that the new games are going to come out years apart. A whole new singleplayer campaign and some changes to multiplayer are pretty much the standard for sequels to popular games right now.
StarCraft II finally released over a decade after the original, and from what I gather, it's merely more of the same. There are certain expectations of a game that's had that long a development cycle, especially from a company as large and "well-respected" as ActiBlizzard. The fact that these are all facets of the same game which when purchased add up to $180 when completed doesn't help matters. And what kind of changes to the multiplayer do you think they'll add between now and the next game, the Zerg campaign? A few new units? That kind of thing would constitute incredibly minor changes that companies like Valve would do for free. Unless the entire game is being updated between now and the Zerg campaign, that doesn't fly.
But hey, I'm not a fan to begin with, so being someone who wouldn't normally buy everything ActiBlizzard releases, I have a different outlook.
APM = actions per minute?