Draco- You're trying to say that in Zeedog's definition of Furry, you're obliged to RP, which is false, right? I do agree that furries don't have to RP, but what Zeedog is describing is NOT RPing. When you RP, you're basically acting, and assigning yourself a character unlike yourself in which you pretend to be. You fill a "role" like in a play. The actor who plays badass mobster probably goes home at night lives a law-abiding life completely different then the one he portrays on TV. However, behaving like a furry, as in, mewing, purring, petting, etc, are NOT forms of RP if that is how YOU would act as yourself. Personally, I yelp when I'm hurt or startled, but I'm not pretending to be a dog. It's my intrinsic reaction, and for that you could call me anthropomorphized. I'm not PRETENDING, but BEING. That is the fundimental difference betwene RPing as a furry, and BEING a furry. People who purr and bark are anthropomorphizing themselves, thus expressing THEIR inner animal, and THAT is what makes them furry. If you are completely human, yet you like the look of furries, then that doesn't make you a furry! Some part of you has to feel remotely animal. The reason I like furry art isn't because I'm furry, it's because I like art in general! Art isn't the main staple of being a furry, you don't even have to like the art to be furry. They're very unrelated! The only reason they've come together, is so people can project their self images for others to see, in a cheeper, more effective way then fursuiting and stuff. And if you like the art because you feel the connection to that little bit of animal inside you when you see it, then that makes you furry. But simply liking the art because it looks cool doesn't. That's why not all kids that like Mickey Mouse are furries, because after the show is over, they forget about animals and return to being a human. But if there is a kid who sees Mickey and feels a strong connection to him because he's an animal, then he could quite possibly be a furry.
And acting furry is not exclusive to purring and such. You could just FEEL furry. And if you feel furry, then you're mentally transforming yourself into something other then pure human. You can express your inner animal feelings however you like, like.. volunteering at an animal shelter because the animal part inside you feels sympathy for poor abandoned pets. You don't have to be outragous about it, skritching and glomping people and claiming to be 100% animal and dressing up. But you gotta feel like something other then just purely a human that enjoys some welldone art.
And when I say the animal part inside you, I'm not refering to you being ACTUALLY part animal, or having an animal spirit or anything. I'm saying that all creatures on this planet have lives that are intertwined. Because of that, a lot of us relate to animals very personally, and that "animal part" tends to shine through. But then again, it's a popular human tendancy to separate themselves from animals completely, and even though they feel sympathy for them every once in a while, they still believe they're on a completely separate plane. Some people even believe that animals are equal, yet still separate. As for me, I'm still neutral. I'm not defining myself as furry just yet, but I'm still not dismissing it completely. I haven't even completely discovered myself yet, so give me some time.
Zeedog- I agree with everything that you've said! I believe that the furry fandom is watering down the definition just so that everyone who's remotely curious can label themselves the same. I have no clue when being a furry suddenly meant the same thing as liking them.
And whoever said that I shouldn't compare football players to furries, think about this: There are kids who like watching football players play, and there are kids who strive to BE one. Should they both be labeled in the same fashion? Or do they actually have completely different motives?