2.6, 2.8, 2.9 and 2.11 all apply in my opinion.
2.6 - Content that was neither made by nor for the uploader is prohibited. - but, even if they're copypasta'ing from multiple pics they're technically still making it, or putting it together like a collage. like, in grade school when you cut things out of magazines, right?
2.8 - Content of poor quality (e.g. fuzzy audio, blurry images, incorrectly rotated) is prohibited. - they aren't really blury, or ill rotated. (at least the ones i've seen.) they've all been upright, and clear, even in thumbnail form.
2.9 - Content lacking artistic merit (e.g. text only images, empty documents) is prohibited. - these images are clearly not text-only or empty documents. maybe they're lacking artistic merit to you. but even collages can have artistic merit. otherwise teachers working at art schools wouldn't make them an exercise in class.
2.11 - Content that is traced, plagiarized, or stolen is prohibited, including any character that is heavily derived from another userâ€™s unique character. - this is sort of a sticky area where i will probably agree with your point to an extent. because alot of artists always fight the 'i found it on google it's free game' argument with their own art.
honestly, i think you're nit-picking, and manipulating the rules to your own definition (mostly the artistic merit rule, but that can be a notorious grey area). i dont really like this meme.. but i dont think it's so bad there needs to be a rally cry to knock them all down.