
Yes.
I could use some more SP. Attack. >:}I suggest Calm Mind.
You can share those thoughts, really. We won't mind. In fact, I encourage it. Please.
I'd be surprised if we got DLC. I expect some sort of Pokemon Z instead, with something to differentiate it from other third versions.
You can share those thoughts, really. We won't mind. In fact, I encourage it. Please.
Because a game with 700+ monsters needs something like that added in. -_-
GAME FREAK MAKES THE GAMES.
I was hunting for a certain pokemon and a shiny Dedenne popped up randomly. :'D
He's so cute~ X3
I'm kinda jealous, Dedenne is adorable![]()
And I'm fucking glad they don't fill pokemon with pointless cameos.GAME FREAK is a subsidiary of Nintendo- they are 53% owned by Nintendo so if they wanted to cross promote other games that they sell in the Pokemon games, more power to 'em. You could always draw upon earlier ideas in Pokemon creation- it could also be argued that the Pokemon Jigglypuff was inspired by Kirby, especially given their similar movesets in Smash Bros. HAL, which programed Kirby, worked on Smash Bros. Also, the Pokemon franchise was rented out by HAL to create Pokemon Snap, which took part in a promotion with Blockbuster (RIP) for a Pokemon photography contest, as well as Pokemon Stadium. I don't know if anyone really cared for either of those two games but not every Pokemon game was made by Game Freak.
Because that's a completely original thing. I seriously doubt any of those were pokemon (I've seen the sprites, none having anything pokemon-ish about them).I also would not be surprised if rejected Pokemon ideas might find their way into other Nintendo games, because obviously the subsidiaries would work laterally to see which ideas fit best in which game. If HAL and Game Freak really are so close, then I suspect the enemies I played against in Mother 3 could have been rejected Pokemon. HAL and Game Freak being so close would also explain why the layout of Pokemon and Earthbound are very close- both are RPGs set in a modern world, both have teenage protagonists, and both use a sense of humor to tell engaging stories. It's just that Pokemon was the commercial success that Earthbound never became.
And I'm fucking glad they don't fill pokemon with pointless cameos.
Smash Bros. is something very different, I highly doubt they had similar movesets because of that. (Though Jigglypuff's design could have been inspired by Kirby. Though they look different enough that it's not an obnoxious.)
Yeah I know a lot of the spin offs are handled by more than just game freak.
Because that's a completely original thing. I seriously doubt any of those were pokemon (I've seen the sprites, none having anything pokemon-ish about them).
Though certain elements of pokemon seem to have slight influences from Mother. Such as Mewtwo/Giegue or FR/LG Blue's jacket looking a lot like the masked man's.
(Though this could be the influence of Creatures Inc.)
None of the Pika-clones have been able to capture the cute but not too cute charm of Pikachu.Dedenne is adorable, I agree but it looks like Nintendo really liked the marketability of Pikachu, the franchise mascot and redrew him several times. First, they made him blue and named it Marill, now they give him a more mouse-like appearance and an electrical cord tail. However, you can't really replace the face of a franchise.
ಠ_à²Itoi was more of an artiste who wanted to see his vision of a kid's coming-of-age story in a land that resembled suburban America come to life, even if it became a money pit. Tajiri ended up creating a cash cow, based on his love of capturing insects and battling them as a kid in one of Tokyo's forested wards. One was a commercial failure that serves as a sort of time capsule to the 1990's to a hardcore dedicated group, the other a monumental success that turned many '90s kids into anime-loving Nipponophiles.
None of the Pika-clones have been able to capture the cute but not too cute charm of Pikachu.
None of the Pika-clones have been able to capture the cute but not too cute charm of Pikachu.
And too think Clefairy was gonna be the mascot originally.
It's TOO cute.![]()
Now go jump off the highest peak you can find. :c
That's what I was saying about the "too cute" thing.It's not that Clefairy isn't cute and marketable, it's just pink and feminine. If that was the face of Pokemon, then how would Nintendo get prepubescent American boys to think that this wasn't a "girls' toy" and buy into it. Besides, when Ash got Pikachu as his first Pokemon- and we all thought of ourselves as Ash- there wasn't going to be another Pokemon that would dethrone Pikachu as the most popular.