Just to elaborate on my "Easier said than done", for those that disagree:
If it were that easy to get 'neer to de-admin the inactive ones, would we be having this conversation?
Would this thread even exist, then? I think not.
Today's update.
Idle admin complains on the chat that he/she will be very busy and doesn't have time to answer tickets.
(we are all busy!)
Well at least this one is honest. /:Idle admin doesn't know what the rules are anymore.
Well at least this one is honest. /:
Idle admin complains on the chat that he/she will be very busy and doesn't have time to answer tickets.
(we are all busy!)
Idle admin complains about not wanting to answer tickets. (Wants to use notes, which lack admin transparency)
We have new admins that have answered over 700 tickets since brought on.
Idle admin doesn't know what the rules are anymore.
Today's update.
Idle admin complains on the chat that he/she will be very busy and doesn't have time to answer tickets.
(we are all busy!)
Idle admin complains about not wanting to answer tickets. (Wants to use notes, which lack admin transparency)
We have new admins that have answered over 700 tickets since brought on.
Idle admin doesn't know what the rules are anymore.
Am I the only one that has a problem with this?
Today's update.
Idle admin complains on the chat that he/she will be very busy and doesn't have time to answer tickets.
(we are all busy!)
Idle admin complains about not wanting to answer tickets. (Wants to use notes, which lack admin transparency)
We have new admins that have answered over 700 tickets since brought on.
Idle admin doesn't know what the rules are anymore.
Am I the only one that has a problem with this?
Really? We need the nitpick game so we can start looking like we're bickering amongst each other?
I mean really, that's what you want?
Just to elaborate on my "Easier said than done", for those that disagree:
If it were that easy to get 'neer to de-admin the inactive ones, would we be having this conversation?
Would this thread even exist, then? I think not.
since when ONLINE petitions did anything?Would a petition from us members of FA and FAF imploring the removal of admins that are not as active or not active at all given the 10 day grace period be of any effect? I feel like it is a dumb idea but maybe if a bunch of us spoke up from the fandom to back you guys it might get done quicker or more efficient.
since when ONLINE petitions did anything?
Worked with my local animal shelter to change from the gas to lethal injection. Yes they do work.
Today's update.
Idle admin complains on the chat that he/she will be very busy and doesn't have time to answer tickets.
(we are all busy!)
Idle admin complains about not wanting to answer tickets. (Wants to use notes, which lack admin transparency)
We have new admins that have answered over 700 tickets since brought on.
Idle admin doesn't know what the rules are anymore.
Am I the only one that has a problem with this?
Animal shelter is one thing. Furry fandom is something else.
No you're not.
Giving these guys 10 more days to shape up was a terrible idea. I was expecting them to increase their activity-even just a bit-but fuck, the fact they DON'T want to do their job or DON'T KNOW how to do it just caught me off guard.
Speaking in defense of SOME of the admins in question...
Some of the admins in question are stepping up and doing some work. I can't speak as to how much additional work it is, but usually there's a whole raft of trouble tickets from earlier in the day waiting for me when I start my shift at work.
Today, when I started doing tickets, we already blasted through all but the ones that take sometime to resolve. I don't know if this was just a lower amount of tickets today, or showing that we are getting some extra assistance.
Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal, but I am seeing some more activity from some of the admins named. Not going to defend the admin in question that Arshes was complaining about, though.