A sentiment you may or may not be seeing again. Depends on what I decide upon.
Considering you decided to bring up the topic of religion yesterday, I don't think it's particularly rich. I argued against your points which you practically asked for.
The savoury and delicious taste of your post is less about the subject matter, and more about the people in question. It's all "just down to some people's perceptions" when the poster is someone you like, and "singling out that one bit that's a controversial subject" is bad, but when it's a stranger's post you have absolutely no qualms about cherry picking lines and suddenly what's right and wrong are set in stone.
When I provide an incredibly specific opinion on a specific religious belief, suddenly the religious belief itself is "wrong" without any consideration to my opinion it was based upon. If you had a higher opinion of me, would you still have said the same things, and not that we are all free to believe as we wish? Rather than attack the principle of the religion without regard to any previous points or opinions raised?
I think not, and the hypocrisy of "let's not start another dumpster fire" as a response to someone you like while contributing to the last few started by a stranger is worth pointing out. You didn't address my actual point or opinion, no one did.
Oh I don't doubt I'll see such a sentiment again, should one of the in-group post something a little too spicy for public airs. However, personally I was never afforded such sentiments nor do I anticipate it in the future, irregardless of my polite and calm responses to you and others. Am I telling you to change your behaviours or your beliefs? No, just pointing them out.
