Myr said:
And the entire site does not revolve around the forums and IRC. There are thousands more people on the entire site that have an opinion on this matter and although their opinion is not popular with you and some others it still can get out. Requesting people to join in and voice their opinion is not a call to arms nor a way of forcing people to be a part of something they don't want to. People came to this thread voluntarily because of recent events on this site relating to myself and Arcturus. Nobody was forced but they were given the link. If anything, this really highlights that "silent majority" of users who don't want to get involved in things, but when something big enough shows up they will read and take note. Wolfblade linked people to his post, and as you know it's pretty long. For people to read all of that and post shows their intent on being a part of what's going on around here. A good dozen or more people have chosen to get involved and that number may increase.
And considering Wolfblade had to correct several of those people, I don't think they read his whole post through. Not to mention, his post is just as biased as mine is (which is to say, significantly) and for a lot of these new users this is all the information about this situation they have, and there are reams of background information that could be useful.
(also, most of the people posting seem to be of the 'scared furry' type who see hackers lurking behind every corner, and don't actually seem to know what hacking actually
is. Or they are the overly-polite decency police. Either way, I have a hard time taking them seriously.*)
* to footnote, I realize there are all manners of logical fallicies in that last sentence, but they are just the logical fallicies people generally use while debating (that being "I don't like this person's views on [x], therefore their views on [y] are flawed or unimportant", otherwise known as "Ad hominem") so I don't feel really bad saying this because if need be I can back up my 'fearful personality => lack of information/lack of logical though' connection, which would make it a legitimate argument.