Fur Affinity Forums
High-res uploads aren't new, weren't paywalled, and really didn't need to be when this previous, much-better feature existed for well over a decade, for free. Yes, "feature." you really can't tell me that it's not one by now, after this much time and usage, AND the fact that the workaround was literally stated ON the upload page.
(Edit: Including ^this up here as well.)
In order to "enable" high-res image uploads for the public, all you had to do was nothing. That's it. Literally nothing.
But hey, why do what y'all are great at when instead, for a few quick hyped-up subscription sales, you could make an objectively worse (paywall tier included) version of what we had previously, AND break the promise of leaving current already-free site features unaffected in the process, am I right?
Ranting and seething aside, I really am curious though. I'd like to read any actual reasoning behind this promise-breaking paywalled downgrade and why you think it's a remotely acceptable/agreeable course of action, if any higher-ups reading this are willing to share. Like, genuinely. ^^
(Edit: Including ^this up here as well.)
In order to "enable" high-res image uploads for the public, all you had to do was nothing. That's it. Literally nothing.
But hey, why do what y'all are great at when instead, for a few quick hyped-up subscription sales, you could make an objectively worse (paywall tier included) version of what we had previously, AND break the promise of leaving current already-free site features unaffected in the process, am I right?
Ranting and seething aside, I really am curious though. I'd like to read any actual reasoning behind this promise-breaking paywalled downgrade and why you think it's a remotely acceptable/agreeable course of action, if any higher-ups reading this are willing to share. Like, genuinely. ^^