Hateful Bitch
Hang up your coat
Spoilers: People here find pansexuals hard to understand because they are pansexuals but don't realise that they aren't bisexual.
Even if you get that nitpicky with a definition, and that definition can still be broken down into the male/female dichotomy (you either like males or females because that's all there really is to choose from save some super minute percent of birth deformities), there still isn't a need for a new term. Just say "I'm bisexual, but I'll fuck anything with screwed up gentiles" :VI guess I get what you mean. Generally I do say I'm bisexual, but there is a little difference. While this has classed Bisexual but leaning towards hetero or homo, normally bisexuality is seen as liking both genders but often having a preference. Pansexuality is similar, only instead of liking both genders one simply does not see gender as being much of a factor.
It's a minor difference, rather persnickety I suppose.. I very much agree with your last statement, 'It comes down to what you are, not some stupid term for it' in that I don't really care for the whole labelling thing that comes with sexualities ^^'
Even if you get that nitpicky with a definition, and that definition can still be broken down into the male/female dichotomy (you either like males or females because that's all there really is to choose from save some super minute percent of birth deformities), there still isn't a need for a new term. Just say "I'm bisexual, but I'll fuck anything with screwed up gentiles" :V
Even if you get that nitpicky with a definition, and that definition can still be broken down into the male/female dichotomy (you either like males or females because that's all there really is to choose from save some super minute percent of birth deformities), there still isn't a need for a new term. Just say "I'm bisexual, but I'll fuck anything with screwed up gentiles" :V
True, heterosexuals can and do have problems with transgenders, but the idea that we need a pansexual definition because of this doesn't fly for me. The transgender thing seems to fall outside of sexual attraction, because a man can be attracted to a MtF and only get pissed when he finds out that the girl he was screwing wasn't always a girl.There's more than intersex people outside of the gender binary. Consider how many heterosexual men view male-to-female transgender individuals. There's a distinction of preference made there that falls outside of the usual scale of sexual orientation. Of course, how you denote this sort of thing is difficult to conclude, and only bringing it up in the case of bisexuality doesn't clarify much.
Spoilers: People here find pansexuals hard to understand because they are pansexuals but don't realise that they aren't bisexual.
Lol does it seem a bit offensive to anyone else to put transgenders as separate from male and female when talking about sexuality?
*staring, waiting for your answer* O_OI'm afraid to touch that subject... no, I'm actually terrified.
not wanting a relationship doesn't mean that you're asexual.I have no concrete idea.... I've never really been in a relationship to speak of, so I can't really say where I feel most comfortable. For that matter, I just don't feel too interested in a relationship at the moment anyway..... man, I hope that doesn't mean I'm Asexual.![]()
because so many long-time veterans on FaF recommended it
Check out the sexuality poll on BadDragon.
Heterosexual - 22%
Bisexual leaning straight - 16%
Bisexual even 50/50 - 8%
Bisexual leaning gay - 6%
Gay - 15%
Omnisexual/Pansexual - 25%
Asexual - 2%
Other - 6%
IDK, maybe they are only attracted to omnivores.