• Fur Affinity Forums are governed by Fur Affinity's Rules and Policies. Links and additional information can be accessed in the Site Information Forum.

Who creates non-anthro art (Part 2)

What is your solution when you DO have non-anthro work to share?

  • I try and test the waters with FA first and see if it will be acceptable

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I post the non-furry/non-anthro art to a site (please specify in thread)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I only post furry/anthro content on the net. The non-anthro works I keep to myself

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I post the non-furry/non-anthro art to a site (please specify in thread), AND make an FA journal ent

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other (please specify in thread)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

SageHendrix

Member
http://www.furaffinityforums.net/showthread.php?tid=13918

As seen in the last poll, there is a decent amount of people on here that are at least 50/50 about non-furry art vs furry/anthro art. This indicates to me that there is a decent amount of furries that do art outside of the "furry" box.

Since FA has policies about non-furry content that can be quite inconsistent at times (some submissions rejected for not being furry enough but other similar submissions passing the ill-defined "furry litmus test"), what is the solution for many of you?
 

SageHendrix

Member
Bumping this because someone voted but they did not specify which art site they post the non-furry art on.

Kat
 

Danza

Member
Hehe, I do both and often mix them too but it has some things like vore too so dont look if you don't like :D

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/danza

I selected the top option, interesting as I have seen things that are far different than just fur art on fur affin :3
 

Tasuric

Not the fur you are looking fo
I only draw non anthro cetaceans at the moment, and i post those.. right here. :)
 

Satoshi

Has magical powers.
I mix my stuff :> It's anthro, but with Japanese anime touch. None of it goes on dA or sA. Or even y!gallery xD
Because of the sketchy nature of my pictures c:

Besides.

A lot of people like them :D

http://furaffinity.net/user/satoshisagara
 

shinmew

New Member
I draw both, but I don't post everything I draw online. Mostly what I do draw for the net turns out to be furry, I want to draw more humans for the net, but still have a few furry pics I want to do first.
 

foxystallion

Born Furry
Catwoman69y2k said:
... what is the solution for many of you?

Much to my surprise and dismay FA considered this image guilty of "excessive sexuality" and removed it. It doesn't upset the dA censors, perhaps because this was the first image in a series for a little photomorph tutorial and had not been furrified yet:
http://foxystallion.deviantart.com/art/Foxystallion-s-First-Photo-A-43595587

Some of my images are transformational - because they have both fur and genitals they are unacceptable to dA, and because they have both skin and genitals, they are unacceptable to FA. My solution? A photojerk.com adult account. FA, unlike dA, allows links to AUP non-compliant material, a freedom for which I am thankful. Examples:
http://files.photojerk.com/foxystallion/FAb/coyotebeautiful070201dAPDR_0597.jpg
http://files.photojerk.com/foxystallion/FAb/FoxystallionSurfingNOVAsMidnightWaves0709131280x1024nude.jpg
The magnificent scene is [NOVA]'s creation, and used with his permission.
 

SageHendrix

Member
foxystallion said:
Catwoman69y2k said:
... what is the solution for many of you?

Much to my surprise and dismay FA considered this image guilty of "excessive sexuality" and removed it. It doesn't upset the dA censors, perhaps because this was the first image in a series for a little photomorph tutorial and had not been furrified yet:
http://foxystallion.deviantart.com/art/Foxystallion-s-First-Photo-A-43595587

Some of my images are transformational - because they have both fur and genitals they are unacceptable to dA, and because they have both skin and genitals, they are unacceptable to FA. My solution? A photojerk.com adult account. FA, unlike dA, allows links to AUP non-compliant material, a freedom for which I am thankful. Examples:
http://files.photojerk.com/foxystallion/FAb/coyotebeautiful070201dAPDR_0597.jpg
http://files.photojerk.com/foxystallion/FAb/FoxystallionSurfingNOVAsMidnightWaves0709131280x1024nude.jpg
The magnificent scene is [NOVA]'s creation, and used with his permission.
Yeah, even though it is part of a series.... I know that not all mods might think alike on this issue. Once Skunkman001 asked mods about an image before posting it so he wouldn't get in trouble. The mod said it was fine and so he posted it. Days later, it was pulled by another mod who obviously did not find it acceptable.

As for photojerk....its a shame that it isnt an art site but it is a good place to put stuff that fits nieither FA's terms of use nor dAs. Then you can link to them in your journal or link to it in the other photos of the series that WERE acceptable on dA or FA.

Kat
 
I actually don't do much "furry" art. Most of the stuff I do is jewellery, some of which has animals some of which doesn't. I have tried drawing furry art, but found, most of my stuff doesn't turn out that well. Apart from the white pencil on black card, which seems to turn out well.
But, I do post the art I do here, I sometimes post my stuff to DA, but, I find I get more recogniction here for things I do.
 

foxystallion

Born Furry
Catwoman69y2k said:
foxystallion said:
Catwoman69y2k said:
... what is the solution for many of you?

Much to my surprise and dismay FA considered this image guilty of "excessive sexuality" and removed it. It doesn't upset the dA censors, perhaps because this was the first image in a series for a little photomorph tutorial and had not been furrified yet:
http://foxystallion.deviantart.com/art/Foxystallion-s-First-Photo-A-43595587

Some of my images are transformational - because they have both fur and genitals they are unacceptable to dA, and because they have both skin and genitals, they are unacceptable to FA. My solution? A photojerk.com adult account. FA, unlike dA, allows links to AUP non-compliant material, a freedom for which I am thankful. Examples:
http://files.photojerk.com/foxystallion/FAb/coyotebeautiful070201dAPDR_0597.jpg
http://files.photojerk.com/foxystallion/FAb/FoxystallionSurfingNOVAsMidnightWaves0709131280x1024nude.jpg
The magnificent scene is [NOVA]'s creation, and used with his permission.
Yeah, even though it is part of a series.... I know that not all mods might think alike on this issue. Once Skunkman001 asked mods about an image before posting it so he wouldn't get in trouble. The mod said it was fine and so he posted it. Days later, it was pulled by another mod who obviously did not find it acceptable.

As for photojerk....its a shame that it isnt an art site but it is a good place to put stuff that fits nieither FA's terms of use nor dAs. Then you can link to them in your journal or link to it in the other photos of the series that WERE acceptable on dA or FA.

Kat

Yes, it really is a shame that photojerk.com isn't an art site; there are no provisions for viewer's comments and journals. Why the hell isn't there an art site that allows anything legal under Federal law? I'm paying $20 per year for photojerk, which is simply a photobucket that doesn't steal your money, ban you, and refuse to even tell you what got their dander up. As far as I am concerned paid accounts on photobucket are a scam and a ripoff. I wish that I had found photojerk earlier.
 

kingkento

Member
Almost all of my submissions are "non furry". I post them to FA, and have yet to have a problem. I have almost 200 watchers, and am more comfortable posting here than say DA.

Though i am trying to expand and make some furry work.
 
Top