Why do trolls hate us ?

[NerdyMunk]

Who knows what goes on in the mind of a troll. They are just like cerial killers, they are unexpected or confusing in their behavior.

 

[Hollow-Dragon]

Honestly, I think trolls exist for our entertainment... because very time I see one, I just burst out laughing my ass off.

The worst I ever got from a "troll" was a guy asked me if I was a furry, I said yes, and then he scoffed and walked away.

See! I find that funny.

 

[Beastcub]

"if you poke somthing with a stick and it squirms, YOUR GONNA POKE IT AGAIN!" - 2, The Ranting Gryphon

i simply love this quote, it'd so damn true both litterally and symbolic wise. (*pokes catarpillar with stick)

i have never met a furry troll in real life

but in highschool there were some guys that gave me a real rash of shit about liking fantasy stuff and teased the beggebers out of me.

and 70% of the people in my art classes downright hated anime (including one of my teachers) and thought that "the anime style has perverted the world of art" and bashed me the very first time i did something anime style,

and in grade school i got teased for liking nature and animals so much.

BUT at the same time i had friends in school who liked what i liked and there was even an anime club in highschool and one year we had 48 members (who actually showed up nearly every time). but even then we would have random people come in, hang out for 5 minutes, eat our snacks, scoff at us and leave >:[

 

[Whitenoise]

simple:

because we're weird.
plain as a white sheet, man.

We're just straight up weird people in a world that strives to hang on to some form of communal normalcy.

I mean, just think about this for an example:
It's not weird to blantantly sexist, racist or rude. (them)
However, it IS weird to be nice, art-loving, and to feel connected to animals. (us)

oh and in racism, I DON'T mean against furries. We are NOT a race. Go on encyclopediadramatica, search up women or african-american and you'll see what I mean.


OH one more thing:
It is SO incredibly easy to be mean over the internet.
I wear my tail EVERYDAY and I rarely EVER get any shit from people for it. The worst I ever got from a "troll" was a guy asked me if I was a furry, I said yes, and then he scoffed and walked away.

Trolls rarely step away from their computer moniters.

Have you ever looked up white people on Encyclopaedia Dramatica?

Also it is weird to welcome dog fucking paedophiles into your subculture, I think that's the real problem the world has, if it even cares enough to have one, which I doubt.

 

[Beastcub]

Also it is weird to welcome dog fucking paedophiles into your subculture.

dude no kidding, the nature furry fandom attracted them and its sick that they got associated with furries (the only thing that a troll can say that will piss me off anymore is i F*** animals) yes there is a sexual side of the fandom but its with anthro-animals.
furry fandom attracts zooaphiles like cubscouts attract pedophiles (bad example but it's the best i could come up with...)

 

[Quiet269]

^What about the entire "Non-Anthro" Category on FA?

 

[Whitenoise]

dude no kidding, the nature furry fandom attracted them and its sick that they got associated with furries (the only thing that a troll can say that will piss me off anymore is i F*** animals) yes there is a sexual side of the fandom but its with anthro-animals.
furry fandom attracts zooaphiles like cubscouts attract pedophiles (bad example but it's the best i could come up with...)

The furry fandom has really become way too welcoming to human garbage and I can't help but think the whole fandom is really gonna suffer when the public finds out, especially about the paedophiles using anthropomorphism to skirt child pornography laws. I mean how are people going to react to fursuiters if they know it could be a sex offender in there. I've heard some really troubling stories about some people in fur suits glomming all over children at cons. Seems a fursuit would be a very attractive tool for a paedophile to get close to kids without anyone being suspicious, and it honestly worries me. People say there's no way to stop worthless people from coming here but it seems to me not letting them post thinly veiled child porn on furry websites would be a good start.

 

[Quiet269]

^might as well start your fear mongering on sites that don't skirt the rules with furry, and instead just go with drawings of kids having sex? Wouldn't those be worse?

 

[Whitenoise]

^might as well start your fear mongering on sites that don't skirt the rules with furry, and instead just go with drawings of kids having sex? Wouldn't those be worse?

Not fear mongering, just common sense, and it's just as bad when it's anthropomorphised children. It bothers me most when I see it here because as much as it pisses me off I actually do care about the furry fandom.

 

[Quiet269]

So, you don't care about the children? Just the Fandom? If you really cared about it you would attempt to stop it in any form, not just posting on random threads generalizing the entire fandom based on a very small group, and calling that small group of people pedophiles and rapists...

What about the "tame" pictures? What about art featuring children? How far does it go?

 

[Whitenoise]

So, you don't care about the children? Just the Fandom? If you really cared about it you would attempt to stop it in any form, not just posting on random threads generalizing the entire fandom based on a very small group, and calling that small group of people pedophiles and rapists...

What about the "tame" pictures? What about art featuring children? How far does it go?

Holy crap what? First off, we're talking about illustrated child pornography, illustrated furry child pornography is no better then non-furry. That small group is made up of paedophiles and rapists, whether they have the stones to admit it to themselves is irrelevant. I never called all furries paedophiles, but clearly the fandom at large is not actively working to expel them, so my previous assertions are valid. Also what do you mean by tame pictures, do you mean just drawings with children in them? If so I don't really see how that's related.

 

[Quiet269]

What I mean is how far do you take the censorship? Do you take it so far that a child cannot be depicted nude in a painting?
Do you know how many people upload photo's of "bath time" onto the internet?
Do you know how many people take photographs of children who are nude, for whatever reason?

Are all those people pedophiles? Should they be arrested for child pornography?

Just because someone enjoys something in a fantasy world does not mean they want to do it in real life.

And just because someone is nude it does not make it sexual.

Now, I must admit I do not understand the baby fur art, I don't understand how someone would like Bondage, or a ton of other things. But that's for them, if they are not doing it in real life I don't really care.

 

[Whitenoise]

What I mean is how far do you take the censorship? Do you take it so far that a child cannot be depicted nude in a painting?
Do you know how many people upload photo's of "bath time" onto the internet?
Do you know how many people take photographs of children who are nude, for whatever reason?

Are all those people pedophiles? Should they be arrested for child pornography?

Just because someone enjoys something in a fantasy world does not mean they want to do it in real life.

And just because someone is nude it does not make it sexual.

Now, I must admit I do not understand the baby fur art, I don't understand how someone would like Bondage, or a ton of other things. But that's for them, if they are not doing it in real life I don't really care.

First off what kind of idiot uploads a picture on to the internet of their kid naked, who takes naked pictures of their kids in the first place? Honestly I think that kind of activity should at the very least be regarded with suspicion, and even if they aren't a paedophile they should still get a kick in the ass for being a retard. Non-sexual nudity is kind of a grey area I agree, a drawing of a little girl getting gang raped by adult men, furry or otherwise leaves no doubt as to it's intent. Also, how do you know they aren't doing it in real life? That's is the element the fandom attracts when it allows this kind of content. The difference between bondage and paedophilia is consent, simple as that.

 

[Quiet269]

First off what kind of idiot uploads a picture on to the internet of their kid naked, who takes naked pictures of their kids in the first place? Honestly I think that kind of activity should at the very least be regarded with suspicion, and even if they aren't a paedophile they should still get a kick in the ass for being a retard. Non-sexual nudity is kind of a grey area I agree, a drawing of a little girl getting gang raped by adult men, furry or otherwise leaves no doubt as to it's intent. Also, how do you know they aren't doing it in real life? That's is the element the fandom attracts when it allows this kind of content. The difference between bondage and paedophilia is consent, simple as that.

I will say that you know nothing of what people do in real life. Bondage is not always consensual, beastiality is not always consensual, sex is not always consensual, but that does not mean it should all be banned. It simply means that if you catch people doing such things without consent (rape) then you prosecute them. If you start prosecuting everyone for what they might do then you get into a VERY slippery slope and EVERYONE would be put in jail.

As for photographs of children:

Simple google Search: Results 1 - 21 of about 4,170,000 for baby bath. (0.40 seconds)

Looks like a lot of them. I see how far you take the censorship, do not agree with it, and realize I cannot sway your opinion. I bet you think everyone that is part of a nudist colony is a pedophile and sex fiend as well, right?

Anyways, not going to get anywhere, so going to stop discussing this with you before it turns into "drama".

 

[Whitenoise]

I will say that you know nothing of what people do in real life. Bondage is not always consensual, beastiality is not always consensual, sex is not always consensual, but that does not mean it should all be banned. It simply means that if you catch people doing such things without consent (rape) then you prosecute them. If you start prosecuting everyone for what they might do then you get into a VERY slippery slope and EVERYONE would be put in jail.

Thing is fucking a child, like fucking an animal is always rape, the slippery slope argument is invalid.

As for photographs of children:

Simple google Search: Results 1 - 21 of about 4,170,000 for baby bath.

Looks like a lot of them. I see how far you take the censorship, do not agree with it, and realize I cannot sway your opinion. I bet you think everyone that is part of a nudist colony is a pedophile and sex fiend as well, right?

The only thing this proves is that there are a lot of really stupid parents on the internet, and I don't really see why you brought up nudist colonies.

Anyways, not going to get anywhere, so going to stop discussing this with you before it turns into "drama".

 

[Azure]

Yet another thread that features the words "animal" and "rape" in the same sentence. Bloody furries...

 

[Quiet269]

^I know, a crazy bunch, the whole lot of em!

 

[Beastcub]

. I mean how are people going to react to fursuiters if they know it could be a sex offender in there. I've heard some really troubling stories about some people in fur suits glomming all over children at cons. Seems a fursuit would be a very attractive tool for a paedophile to get close to kids without anyone being suspicious, and it honestly worries me.

i have thought this very same thing, but the same suspicions can be applied to little leauge coaches, workers at chucky cheese, mall santas, grade school teachers, day care providers....hell i even heard of not just one but multipul cases of a preist being a pedo.

all i can say to the concept of a fursuit pedo is atleast it does not hurt anyone. i mean the sicko is able to get his kicks without any harm to the child, infact the kid is oblivious and likely enjoys getting to hug a big stuffed animal.

the concept of not knowing a pedo in a fursuit hugging your kid is similar to the idea of not knowing a zooaphile is petting your dog.

it does not hurt anyone but its still sick.

i love fursuits, they are wearable art and thanks to fursuits my dream of living off my art is comming true....so i wish that there weren't all these negative things attached to them (strange sex toy, zooaphile looking the part, pedophile attracting kids) as it threatens to spoil it for me.

 

[Whitenoise]

i have thought this very same thing, but the same suspicions can be applied to little leauge coaches, workers at chucky cheese, mall santas, grade school teachers, day care providers....hell i even heard of not just one but multipul cases of a preist being a pedo.

all i can say to the concept of a fursuit pedo is atleast it does not hurt anyone. i mean the sicko is able to get his kicks without any harm to the child, infact the kid is oblivious and likely enjoys getting to hug a big stuffed animal.

the concept of not knowing a pedo in a fursuit hugging your kid is similar to the idea of not knowing a zooaphile is petting your dog.

it does not hurt anyone but its still sick.

i love fursuits, they are wearable art and thanks to fursuits my dream of living off my art is comming true....so i wish that there weren't all these negative things attached to them (strange sex toy, zooaphile looking the part, pedophile attracting kids) as it threatens to spoil it for me.

The thing that really sets this case apart from the whole, teacher, coach, priest thing is the apparent prevalence of paedophilia here, you'll never see drawings of adults raping kids on a coaching website, so I think people may have a harder time believing that it's just a small group, seeing as they don't really seem to have to keep it a secret here, and I wouldn't blame them. Plus everything about the furry fandom is very appealing to children, you add an apparent acceptance of paedophilia to that and the whole thing becomes awfully sinister. Will the fandom still be able to find hosts for furry cons when that's the public perception? Will it still be safe to walk around in a fursuit? Will people lose their jobs, will animation companies still want to employ people who draw anthro art?

 

[SmoothPorcupine]

This thread doesn't need big posts.

There is the common misconception.. hate isn't the motive. It's nothing personal. Just lulz :/

Why do trolls hate us..

They don't. They acknowledge our existence.

Trolls don't hate furries. Trolls love furries. They think we're the best thing since sliced bread.

your missing the point about trolls. Trolls piss everyone off so that they can feel better bout themselves.

Trolls go after everyone, furs are just easier than others nowadays.

They don't. They just like to watch every easily-angered furry squirm.

• They hate everyone, so we qualify.
• The don't actually hate, they are trolling. (Well some hate.)

A better question is why furries get more trolls, and that has been answered many times in this thread already.

I still don't understand where people get this idea that trolls hate us.

That comes from effective trolls. :|

Wow, where did this thread come from? And why haven't I trolled the bejeezus out of it?

Irony allergy?

 

[Beastcub]

The thing that really sets this case apart from the whole, teacher, coach, priest thing is the apparent prevalence of paedophilia here, you'll never see drawings of adults raping kids on a coaching website, so I think people may have a harder time believing that it's just a small group, seeing as they don't really seem to have to keep it a secret here, and I wouldn't blame them. Plus everything about the furry fandom is very appealing to children, you add an apparent acceptance of paedophilia to that and the whole thing becomes awfully sinister. Will the fandom still be able to find hosts for furry cons when that's the public perception? Will it still be safe to walk around in a fursuit? Will people lose their jobs, will animation companies still want to employ people who draw anthro art?

well anime has some pretty sick stuff, tentical rape for one. anime also has alot of porn (hentai) and its sold to the puplic (any anime specailty store i have been to had 1/3 of the place marked 18+ ) it can also be terribly violent and have drug usage.

the latest troll tangent is that anime promotes pedos ...which i can see why what with all the 18 year old characters that look 12...and in the anime negima i cannot help but be bothered by the fact there is a guy cursed to be a ferret who likes to "steal the underpants of little girls" (and this show is on TV and seems innocent)

the idea of pedos in fursuits also leaps over to ones dressed as pikachu and sonic ect. as well as human characters like the guy from sailor moon (saw lots of little girls hugging that guy back when it was popular)

there is "yaoi" and "yuri" which is guy on guy and girl on girl relations and its on the rise, the last con i went to had paddles (like you spank with) that had "i love yaoi" written on them and Tshirts and it seems devaint art is now over run with fan art of yaoi/yuri.

but anime has plenty of cons, some of which have "adult only" events, the local con here had "hot yaoi night" which was an 18+ dance. there are also folders of art marked 18+

and yet anime is mass marketed to kids and has perfectly innocent things like hello kitty.

the key to saving furry fandom's image should it go more public is to set a clear line that it has adults only content as well as family friendly aspects in the same way that the anime fandom also has adults only and family friendly factors.

 

[Ozriel]

Why do trolls hate us?

We are Childish furfags that can't take in opinion within and from people outside the fandom, and we are too easy to rile up. If we cannot force feed our fandom down someones throat, we whine about "OMG I'm being Fursecuted!!!!111!!!"

We have Skeletons we need to clean out of the closet (Along with Tom Cruise), and the first thing we need to do is admit it instead of whining like children, that the Fandom is not flowers, butterflies, rainbows and Cake. In truth it isn't.

And Trolls can be assholes online to people to make a point. You do not take them seriously.

 

[Hakar Kerarmor]

*Points and laughs at Zeke*

 

[Quiet269]

Hmm, n/m

 

[Shadow]

My guess is to get a cheap laugh from a popular community. i.e. lulz.